<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One plus for this software&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2011/05/10/one-plus-for-this-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/05/10/one-plus-for-this-software/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:56:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/05/10/one-plus-for-this-software/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=813#comment-782</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not by design, at least mine, but rather a legacy of WordPress&#039;s blog roots. 

It organizes people into three main privilege groups: Authors, Editors, and Admins. That&#039;s too coarse-grained, and it&#039;s the mismatch between our egalitarian expectations and a categorization from the blog world that&#039;s chafing.

Authors have fewer privileges than a discussion participant should have, including self-editing rights. And Editors have more privileges than participants need, but fewer than moderators need. But Admin confers too many dangerous technical powers to give to all but a select few. So at the moment, &lt;i&gt;nobody&lt;/i&gt; has exactly the right mix.

Damn if it doesn&#039;t sound like Goldilocks and the Three Bears, doesn&#039;t it?

Anyway, I&#039;m aware of the problem, and how it can rub against our social expectations. I&#039;ll have to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not by design, at least mine, but rather a legacy of WordPress&#8217;s blog roots. </p>
<p>It organizes people into three main privilege groups: Authors, Editors, and Admins. That&#8217;s too coarse-grained, and it&#8217;s the mismatch between our egalitarian expectations and a categorization from the blog world that&#8217;s chafing.</p>
<p>Authors have fewer privileges than a discussion participant should have, including self-editing rights. And Editors have more privileges than participants need, but fewer than moderators need. But Admin confers too many dangerous technical powers to give to all but a select few. So at the moment, <i>nobody</i> has exactly the right mix.</p>
<p>Damn if it doesn&#8217;t sound like Goldilocks and the Three Bears, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m aware of the problem, and how it can rub against our social expectations. I&#8217;ll have to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/05/10/one-plus-for-this-software/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=813#comment-680</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t realize that the regular crowd wasn&#039;t all on the same level of privilege.  That&#039;s not a level playing field, and it might be giving some of us an unfair advantage in presenting information or links.  I&#039;ll keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that the regular crowd wasn&#8217;t all on the same level of privilege.  That&#8217;s not a level playing field, and it might be giving some of us an unfair advantage in presenting information or links.  I&#8217;ll keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: podrock</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/05/10/one-plus-for-this-software/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>podrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=813#comment-678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s because you are an editor.&lt;/p&gt;

I&#039;m still trying to sort out the new caste system.  So far, I find it is a big shortcomming to the new digs.

The old mods became editors.  All other registered became authors.  I think this is why some don&#039;t see the edit button (sorry Rob, VRB, etc).  I&#039;ve been doing experiments with the TestUser and the results seem inconsistant.  Of that&#039;s my memory.

Probably going to create a new doppleganger to explore the Wordpress options.  I&#039;d like to understand this before we take the next step of opening up the boards.  Right now anyone can read the Zone, but only registed can post even a comment, and that is complicated.  There is no means of registering right now.

We&#039;re in an echo chamber with glass walls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because you are an editor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to sort out the new caste system.  So far, I find it is a big shortcomming to the new digs.</p>
<p>The old mods became editors.  All other registered became authors.  I think this is why some don&#8217;t see the edit button (sorry Rob, VRB, etc).  I&#8217;ve been doing experiments with the TestUser and the results seem inconsistant.  Of that&#8217;s my memory.</p>
<p>Probably going to create a new doppleganger to explore the WordPress options.  I&#8217;d like to understand this before we take the next step of opening up the boards.  Right now anyone can read the Zone, but only registed can post even a comment, and that is complicated.  There is no means of registering right now.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re in an echo chamber with glass walls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
