Comments on: Update on the “holographic universe”

By: Eri

Eri — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:30:10 +0000

Only when there’s booze involved.

By: Eri

Eri — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:29:21 +0000

I’ll see if Rover can whip up some pancakes for you. Just leave out the batter mix, some milk and eggs. However, I wouldn’t let Rover near the stove so you’ll have to flip them yourself.

By: mcfly

mcfly — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:09:40 +0000

If that’s the case, I want to thank you for my wife, my kids and my dog.

Oh, and could you think up some pancakes for us tomorrow morning? Just asking…

By: mcfly

mcfly — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:52:55 +0000

Yer always taking TB’s side

By: Eri

Eri — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:18:28 +0000

Decant much better than recant!

By: TB

TB — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:15:48 +0000

No, “decant!” (hic)

By: Eri

Eri — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:02:36 +0000

Maybe the Universe is just a projection of my mind. I created you all.

I feel fuzzy this morning.

Oh, that was just my cat shedding. Never mind.

By: mcfly

mcfly — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:31:26 +0000

“Recant!”

By: VelociraptorBlade

VelociraptorBlade — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:16:54 +0000

The Holographic Universe theory was interesting, and probably could be created in some way in a lab, but I have always had doubt that it is how our universe works.

As for the Scandinavian remark, I’m sending it to all my online friends. Pure lulz.

By: ER

ER — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:51:02 +0000

This is what really matters, Tom. Everything else is just a never-ending search to find cheaper packaging techniques and more effective laundry detergents.

I never thought the universe looked like a hologram. Or a machine, or even a thought.

What the universe really looks like to me is a computer simulation. We are a computer model, being run over and over, with the key parameters modified slightly each time, until the desired result is achieved.