<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newt not &#8220;technically&#8221; a lobbyist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2011/11/30/newt-not-technically-a-lobbyist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/11/30/newt-not-technically-a-lobbyist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:07:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/11/30/newt-not-technically-a-lobbyist/#comment-8980</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=5661#comment-8980</guid>
		<description>Of course not.  Technically. If he were, he&#039;d be in jail now for breaking the law by not registering as a lobbyist. Wouldn&#039;t he?

I can see why lawyers are such sticklers for precise definitions and get so huffy when they are not adhered to to the letter.  They are covering up for somebody.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not.  Technically. If he were, he&#8217;d be in jail now for breaking the law by not registering as a lobbyist. Wouldn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p>I can see why lawyers are such sticklers for precise definitions and get so huffy when they are not adhered to to the letter.  They are covering up for somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
