• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Where we are now RL October 8, 2025 6:02 pm (CurrentEvents)

Blasphemy RL October 7, 2025 2:40 pm (Space/Science)

I cannot listen podrock October 5, 2025 9:27 am (CurrentEvents)

Down Under Report ER October 2, 2025 5:41 pm (Space/Science)

The 3 Body Problem (Spoilers) RobVG October 2, 2025 8:04 am (Science Fiction)

The Expanse is back! BuckGalaxy September 25, 2025 11:21 am (Science Fiction)

Trump Restores $20 Billion in Foreign Aid BuckGalaxy September 24, 2025 8:36 pm (CurrentEvents)

They've cured AIDS RobVG September 19, 2025 9:44 am (CurrentEvents)

Get rid of the comedians. podrock September 19, 2025 7:43 am (CurrentEvents)

From heckling to violence. A growing acceptance of both. RobVG September 17, 2025 4:46 pm (CurrentEvents)

Help me out with Charlie Kirk RobVG September 16, 2025 1:07 pm (CurrentEvents)

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices December 3, 2011 6:53 pm RobVG

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices

Banks can only sell the foreclosed homes at the now depreciated market value- or less. They are taking the same loss as if they were to write down the current homeowner’s loan. And get this, they don‘t take a loss either way.

A real life example:

30 year loans at 5%

Value before collapse = $375000
Monthly payment (interest and principle) = $2000
Interest paid (bank profit) after 30 years = $350000

Now when the bank writes the home down either for a bank owned sale or for the struggling home owner (doubtful):

Current market value = $250,000
Monthly payment = $1300
Interest $233,000

Reduction in profit = $117,000

This reduction is equivalent to the original loan at an interest rate of 1.75% which is 3X the rate the banks pay us on a 12 month CD.

This baffles me because the banks are going to take the hit anyway because they can’t sell the home for more than market value and a most cases they take it the shorts (pun intended).

Why not work with the homeowner who would see a reduction of $700 in their monthly payment? Now banks are letting the home rot for months or renting it for ½ of the rental price of comparable homes in the area. Banks should partner with homeowner, especially since these assholes got us in this mess in the first place!

  • Maybe it's moral. by Robert 2011-12-03 19:02:43
    • Except the loan sharks were willing to work with the borrower when it was to their mutual interest. Maybe ... by ER 2011-12-03 19:14:45

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register