• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

At least they didn't waste a perfectly good bottle of champagne BuckGalaxy May 22, 2025 10:31 pm (Flame)

Re-writing history ER May 22, 2025 8:24 pm (CurrentEvents)

Taking a fresh look at terraforming Mars BuckGalaxy May 20, 2025 11:07 am (Space/Science)

the v and d correction ER May 19, 2025 9:49 am (GeekSpeak)

Clearly threatening language BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 3:43 pm (Flame)

Most common planet type in the Galaxy BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:51 pm (Space/Science)

Large Loathsome Legislation fails in committee BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

Large Hadron Collider Eureka! BuckGalaxy May 15, 2025 11:44 am (Space/Science)

Plan(et) 9 from Outer Space BuckGalaxy May 13, 2025 10:58 am (Space/Science)

Shouldn't there be an Afrikaaner-American studies department in our universities? ER May 12, 2025 2:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

The Orange Criminal POS abandons another ally BuckGalaxy May 7, 2025 10:18 am (CurrentEvents)

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices December 3, 2011 6:53 pm RobVG

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices

Banks can only sell the foreclosed homes at the now depreciated market value- or less. They are taking the same loss as if they were to write down the current homeowner’s loan. And get this, they don‘t take a loss either way.

A real life example:

30 year loans at 5%

Value before collapse = $375000
Monthly payment (interest and principle) = $2000
Interest paid (bank profit) after 30 years = $350000

Now when the bank writes the home down either for a bank owned sale or for the struggling home owner (doubtful):

Current market value = $250,000
Monthly payment = $1300
Interest $233,000

Reduction in profit = $117,000

This reduction is equivalent to the original loan at an interest rate of 1.75% which is 3X the rate the banks pay us on a 12 month CD.

This baffles me because the banks are going to take the hit anyway because they can’t sell the home for more than market value and a most cases they take it the shorts (pun intended).

Why not work with the homeowner who would see a reduction of $700 in their monthly payment? Now banks are letting the home rot for months or renting it for ½ of the rental price of comparable homes in the area. Banks should partner with homeowner, especially since these assholes got us in this mess in the first place!

  • Maybe it's moral. by Robert 2011-12-03 19:02:43
    • Except the loan sharks were willing to work with the borrower when it was to their mutual interest. Maybe ... by ER 2011-12-03 19:14:45

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register