• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Lateral Thinking BuckGalaxy August 23, 2025 11:57 am (Off-Topic)

SNW: The Finest Frontier BuckGalaxy August 23, 2025 12:20 am (Science Fiction)

There's more than Floyd RobVG August 20, 2025 12:24 am (Off-Topic)

Existing instrument on Mars Curiosity Rover could be used to detect life BuckGalaxy August 18, 2025 12:48 pm (Space/Science)

Trump grovels BuckGalaxy August 17, 2025 12:43 pm (CurrentEvents)

Alien:Earth RobVG August 16, 2025 1:44 pm (Science Fiction)

"Project Hail Mary" RobVG August 14, 2025 11:12 am (Science Fiction)

The July numbers (Edited 8/13) ER August 11, 2025 3:48 pm (Space/Science)

Houston, we have a problem BuckGalaxy August 8, 2025 2:50 pm (Space/Science)

Nagasaki memories ER August 6, 2025 1:51 pm (Off-Topic)

Afrikaan- American news ER August 5, 2025 8:01 am (CurrentEvents)

Season 3 - Foundation BuckGalaxy August 2, 2025 12:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Another assurance from mega-corporations bites the dust, with predictable responses. December 8, 2011 11:23 pm bowser

EPA: ‘Fracking’ likely polluted town’s water

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/08/9302971-epa-fracking-likely-polluted-towns-water

 

One of the characteristics of those who pull these stunts on the public is that they never admit they were wrong, even after conclusive demonstrations.  Man-caused global warming, Iraq war, 9-11 caused by Iraq, Vietnam, Enron’s fraudulent manipulation of electrical power and rates, Unions more corrupt than business, etc., and so on.  They just ignore it and move on to the next fallacy.

 

“Doug Hock, a spokesman for EnCana Corp., which owns rights to the Pavillion-area field, slammed the draft report. “The synthetic chemicals could just have easily come from contamination when the EPA did their sampling, or from how they constructed their monitoring wells.”

In an eery statement which describes his statement,

“EPA’s conclusions are not based on sound science but rather on political science,”Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla, said in a statement.”

 

Who are you going to believe.  The EPA, or a Republican Congressman?  Pinocchio, or a Republican Congressman?

  • Inhofe is a mouthpiece for the energy industry. by ER 2011-12-09 06:32:28

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register