<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government smothering private sector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2011/12/08/government-smothering-private-sector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/12/08/government-smothering-private-sector/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:20:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/12/08/government-smothering-private-sector/#comment-9299</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=5822#comment-9299</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Don&#039;t mess with Dupont or Goldman, Sachs.  

Article describes private enterprise, private ownership, disgruntled employee leaving and starting own company.  Obtained government support.  That much we know.  The rest is disputed conjecture, the subject of various lawsuits.

Clearly the article&#039;s writer is predisposed to Cathay, and writes and article sympathetic to them, which by necessity is also sympathetic to Dupont and Goldman, Sachs.  And that description may be the closest to the truth.  

And may not.  Wouldn&#039;t be the first time the news process has been subverted in the interests of giant corporations.

Do we now have Godless Capitalist Chinese bastards?  Why aren&#039;t the evangelists crusading against China now?  Is it because their markets are now more open, and we are importing so much from them?  Would they have been subverted by economic policies?

&quot;According to ChinaAid, an organization that monitors human rights abuses against Christians in
China, the persecution of Christians has worsened for five consecutive years, and the number of
Christians arrested soared by nearly 43% (from 389 to 556 people), between 2009 and 2010.&quot;
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34729.pdf

One might be forced to think so.  After all, the Chinese are still hostile to American Christianity.  The the issue wasn&#039;t religious after all, that their hostility was motivated by mega-corporations difficulties in opening Chinese markets.

Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Don&#8217;t mess with Dupont or Goldman, Sachs.  </p>
<p>Article describes private enterprise, private ownership, disgruntled employee leaving and starting own company.  Obtained government support.  That much we know.  The rest is disputed conjecture, the subject of various lawsuits.</p>
<p>Clearly the article&#8217;s writer is predisposed to Cathay, and writes and article sympathetic to them, which by necessity is also sympathetic to Dupont and Goldman, Sachs.  And that description may be the closest to the truth.  </p>
<p>And may not.  Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time the news process has been subverted in the interests of giant corporations.</p>
<p>Do we now have Godless Capitalist Chinese bastards?  Why aren&#8217;t the evangelists crusading against China now?  Is it because their markets are now more open, and we are importing so much from them?  Would they have been subverted by economic policies?</p>
<p>&#8220;According to ChinaAid, an organization that monitors human rights abuses against Christians in<br />
China, the persecution of Christians has worsened for five consecutive years, and the number of<br />
Christians arrested soared by nearly 43% (from 389 to 556 people), between 2009 and 2010.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34729.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34729.pdf</a></p>
<p>One might be forced to think so.  After all, the Chinese are still hostile to American Christianity.  The the issue wasn&#8217;t religious after all, that their hostility was motivated by mega-corporations difficulties in opening Chinese markets.</p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2011/12/08/government-smothering-private-sector/#comment-9296</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=5822#comment-9296</guid>
		<description>Well, look on the bright side, Tom.  Maybe they&#039;ll stop curing their drywall in formaldehyde now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look on the bright side, Tom.  Maybe they&#8217;ll stop curing their drywall in formaldehyde now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
