<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Romney will lose to Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:41:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10882</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10882</guid>
		<description>Good to &quot;see&quot; you, and know you&#039;re at least middlin&#039; OK.  Welcome back.  (I&#039;m the welcome waggin&#039;.)

Arf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to &#8220;see&#8221; you, and know you&#8217;re at least middlin&#8217; OK.  Welcome back.  (I&#8217;m the welcome waggin&#8217;.)</p>
<p>Arf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcaray</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10881</link>
		<dc:creator>alcaray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10881</guid>
		<description>So you say it was only the right wingers who elected him?  He said a lot of other things too.  And he had a knack for getting people to like him.  I liked him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you say it was only the right wingers who elected him?  He said a lot of other things too.  And he had a knack for getting people to like him.  I liked him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10879</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10879</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Before you go any further, you might want to review Reagan&#039;s 1980 campaign and what he said.&lt;/p&gt;

Start with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreagan1980rnc.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one.&lt;/a&gt;  Be sure to play the audio.  The transcript is a direct audio trancript, complete with verbal bobbles.

The speech isn&#039;t timid, and one can go over it quite a few times without seeing much &quot;moderate.&quot;

The &quot;middle&quot; voted for him because the &quot;middle&quot; is a lot more conservative than most people think.  It just takes someone who knows his own philosophy backwards and forwards, believes in the positions he supports, and can communicate it effectively.

Admittedly, such people are not common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you go any further, you might want to review Reagan&#8217;s 1980 campaign and what he said.</p>
<p>Start with <a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreagan1980rnc.htm" rel="nofollow">this one.</a>  Be sure to play the audio.  The transcript is a direct audio trancript, complete with verbal bobbles.</p>
<p>The speech isn&#8217;t timid, and one can go over it quite a few times without seeing much &#8220;moderate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;middle&#8221; voted for him because the &#8220;middle&#8221; is a lot more conservative than most people think.  It just takes someone who knows his own philosophy backwards and forwards, believes in the positions he supports, and can communicate it effectively.</p>
<p>Admittedly, such people are not common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcaray</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10877</link>
		<dc:creator>alcaray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10877</guid>
		<description>Reagan got the middle to vote for him.  That&#039;s how he got elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan got the middle to vote for him.  That&#8217;s how he got elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcaray</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10875</link>
		<dc:creator>alcaray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10875</guid>
		<description>Romney could get decent numbers of the middle to vote for him.  Huntsman probably could too, but he was never in the race.  I would love for you to nominate either Newt or Paul.

You will note who the Democrats are actually spending money to make look bad.  And I guess you will probably think that&#039;s part of the conspiracy to get him nominated.  Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney could get decent numbers of the middle to vote for him.  Huntsman probably could too, but he was never in the race.  I would love for you to nominate either Newt or Paul.</p>
<p>You will note who the Democrats are actually spending money to make look bad.  And I guess you will probably think that&#8217;s part of the conspiracy to get him nominated.  Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10821</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10821</guid>
		<description>Starting with Nixon, I can&#039;t think of a Republican President who wasn&#039;t hellbent upon subverting the Constitution.  Including Reagan, what with GHWB, Poindexter, North, Casey, et al.

Any historical evaluation which has had time to evaluate all or most of the data will be very harsh on that empty suit, a willing puppet of those who wielded the authority of his administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting with Nixon, I can&#8217;t think of a Republican President who wasn&#8217;t hellbent upon subverting the Constitution.  Including Reagan, what with GHWB, Poindexter, North, Casey, et al.</p>
<p>Any historical evaluation which has had time to evaluate all or most of the data will be very harsh on that empty suit, a willing puppet of those who wielded the authority of his administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10818</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10818</guid>
		<description>Good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10817</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s been a lot of that &quot;reinventing Reagan&quot; stuff going around from liberal sources.&lt;/p&gt;

What&#039;s really amazing is that these liberals back then didn&#039;t seem to be able to recognize what a nice, moderate centrist Reagan was, and instead spent eight solid years attacking him on every last front with everything they had.  Of course, if that&#039;s a recent picture of Romano he was probably still in diapers back then.  Me, I was there.

It&#039;s not like somebody dug up a wooden chest in the past couple of years with all this new information about Reagan in it.  Everything in that article was public knowledge during his presidency.

So why was he a horrible, warmongering, right-wing troglodyte all during his administration, and is being given a Soviet-style &quot;retrofit&quot; by the Ministry now?  Rhetorical question.  The answer&#039;s pretty obvious.  Rewrite history and you get to write the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of that &#8220;reinventing Reagan&#8221; stuff going around from liberal sources.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really amazing is that these liberals back then didn&#8217;t seem to be able to recognize what a nice, moderate centrist Reagan was, and instead spent eight solid years attacking him on every last front with everything they had.  Of course, if that&#8217;s a recent picture of Romano he was probably still in diapers back then.  Me, I was there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like somebody dug up a wooden chest in the past couple of years with all this new information about Reagan in it.  Everything in that article was public knowledge during his presidency.</p>
<p>So why was he a horrible, warmongering, right-wing troglodyte all during his administration, and is being given a Soviet-style &#8220;retrofit&#8221; by the Ministry now?  Rhetorical question.  The answer&#8217;s pretty obvious.  Rewrite history and you get to write the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10816</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When I write, I use precision. &quot;Resounding&quot; does not mean &quot;recounts in Florida for a month.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

It means rolling over the opposition like it wasn&#039;t there.

Reagan.  Twice.

The 1994 Congressional elections.

The 2010 Congressional elections.

Four major elections that had two things in common:  they were complete blowouts, and the Republicans were running on solid conservative ideas.

Must be like the sixth time I&#039;ve tallied that off.  Feel free to wipe it from your brain yet again, as you just completely wiped my earlier refuting of your constant &quot;conspiracy&quot; meme.  You did manage to remember the screaming teenagers, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I write, I use precision. &#8220;Resounding&#8221; does not mean &#8220;recounts in Florida for a month.&#8221;</p>
<p>It means rolling over the opposition like it wasn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>Reagan.  Twice.</p>
<p>The 1994 Congressional elections.</p>
<p>The 2010 Congressional elections.</p>
<p>Four major elections that had two things in common:  they were complete blowouts, and the Republicans were running on solid conservative ideas.</p>
<p>Must be like the sixth time I&#8217;ve tallied that off.  Feel free to wipe it from your brain yet again, as you just completely wiped my earlier refuting of your constant &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; meme.  You did manage to remember the screaming teenagers, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/01/14/why-romney-will-lose-to-obama/#comment-10809</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=7845#comment-10809</guid>
		<description>One of the really ugly features of modern conservatism is its refusal to meet anyone halfway, and its extremist positions.  Not only does this demonize anything of value the Left has to offer, it makes the Left suspicious of anything of value the Right might have to offer. The divisiveness and incivilty they have introduced into American politics is the most threatening danger to American Democracy, with the possible exception of unrestricted campaign contributions by private interests.

I make no apologies for my left of center (by US standards) politics, but I don&#039;t consider myself extremist, indeed, I knew enough extreme leftists in college to know I don&#039;t want any part of that crowd, besides my family&#039;s own experience with Communism in Cuba. In fact, I have always been a fan of Margaret Thatcher, and if I lived in the UK or Canada I&#039;d probably vote Conservative.

But after being insulted and mischaracterized by the New Right, and having to put up with their shrill rhetorical style, their intellectual arrogance and their incestuous alliance with the Christian fundamentalists, I don&#039;t want them in MY country. 

Thanks for posting that article. It&#039;s something weall already know, but its nice to see it so carefully documented and artfully presented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the really ugly features of modern conservatism is its refusal to meet anyone halfway, and its extremist positions.  Not only does this demonize anything of value the Left has to offer, it makes the Left suspicious of anything of value the Right might have to offer. The divisiveness and incivilty they have introduced into American politics is the most threatening danger to American Democracy, with the possible exception of unrestricted campaign contributions by private interests.</p>
<p>I make no apologies for my left of center (by US standards) politics, but I don&#8217;t consider myself extremist, indeed, I knew enough extreme leftists in college to know I don&#8217;t want any part of that crowd, besides my family&#8217;s own experience with Communism in Cuba. In fact, I have always been a fan of Margaret Thatcher, and if I lived in the UK or Canada I&#8217;d probably vote Conservative.</p>
<p>But after being insulted and mischaracterized by the New Right, and having to put up with their shrill rhetorical style, their intellectual arrogance and their incestuous alliance with the Christian fundamentalists, I don&#8217;t want them in MY country. </p>
<p>Thanks for posting that article. It&#8217;s something weall already know, but its nice to see it so carefully documented and artfully presented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
