• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Afrikaan- American news ER August 5, 2025 8:01 am (CurrentEvents)

Season 3 - Foundation BuckGalaxy August 2, 2025 12:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Shoot the messenger BuckGalaxy August 1, 2025 2:00 pm (CurrentEvents)

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Home » Flame

A solution to NASA and military cost over-runs. February 11, 2012 12:58 am bowser

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46334188/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.TzYdKcWLssI

NASA reportedly will slash planetary science to make up for telescope cost overruns

The Mars missions would take $1.4 billion.  The Webb Telescope, originally estimated at $3.5 billion is now up to $8 billion.  $4.5 billion OVER on a $3.5 billion project.  (I know about inflation, which has been quite low, and I don’t care.)

Read about the development of the F-35 and see the same things, and winding up with a near-useless craft.  (One version of the F-35 had it carrying exactly 2 air to air missiles and nothing else.)

The only way to counter this mindset of getting started, just get started, tell ‘em anything but just get started and we’ll have ‘em mentality would be to completely cancel the Webb Telescope.

Take it off the board.  No money for a rocket, sell the scrap to Edmunds and Radio Shack.  None of the “it’s almost done” stuff.  It should have been “almost done” at $3.4 billion, not now.  If you can’t build it right, you can’t run it right, and we’re sorry – after all it’s our money, you’ll get to keep what you’ve been paid.  Hubble was sent up with a faulty mirror, and we had to eat that cost, too.  Perkins-Elmer wasn’t charged a dime.  We’re tired.  Done.

No more.  The unemployment line is downtown, and you are all eligible.  Every damned last one of you, and should have been eligible $4 billion ago.  It would have been much cheaper.

See what happens to other projects downline.

  • Well look on the bright side - at least now the missions cost less than a B-2 bomber :D by VelociraptorBlade 2012-02-11 01:13:13

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register