• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

JPL about to lose ANOTHER 11% of its people RL October 13, 2025 12:00 pm (Space/Science)

Enjoy this and share.... RL October 13, 2025 3:36 am (CurrentEvents)

Already gutted, the CDC faces more brutal cuts RL October 11, 2025 9:45 pm (Space/Science)

A.Indecency RL October 11, 2025 9:37 pm (GeekSpeak)

Dark matter stars RL October 11, 2025 9:01 pm (Space/Science)

R-E-S-P-E-C-T BuckGalaxy October 11, 2025 12:52 pm (Flame)

Fly like an eagle BuckGalaxy October 10, 2025 2:58 pm (CurrentEvents)

Uploading personal photos. One last time.. RobVG October 10, 2025 2:51 pm (GeekSpeak)

Where we are now RL October 8, 2025 6:02 pm (CurrentEvents)

Blasphemy RL October 7, 2025 2:40 pm (Space/Science)

I cannot listen podrock October 5, 2025 9:27 am (CurrentEvents)

Down Under Report ER October 2, 2025 5:41 pm (Space/Science)

Home » CurrentEvents

The neural whip March 12, 2012 5:44 am ER

http://news.yahoo.com/us-military-unveils-non-lethal-heat-ray-weapon-032512781.html

In one of Asimov’s stories, his characters use a non-lethal weapon called a “neural whip”, to discourage attacks by hostile aliens or beasts. It causes intense pain at a distance, but no injury.

“Non-lethal weapons” is an oxymoron. Everything which stops short of killing, such as fire hoses, tear gas, incapacitating agents, rubber bullets, cattle prods, etc, is to be preferred to gunfire from a humane standpoint, but even panic in a crowd can cause death. And anything that incapacitates a healthy young adult has the potential to hurt the old, young, or the seriously wounded. Even if the potential for injury is reduced, it is made up for by the increased temptation to use the weapon because it is “harmless”. Our experience with tasers has already shown abuses.

I guess it always come down to whether the unruly target is a dangerous mob, or peacefully assembled citizen demonstrators. Unfortunately, its always the side with the guns who gets to make that judgement.

All the technology in the world doesn’t free you from the responsibility of making a moral choice. But it can make you forget that you still have the responsibility to do so.

  • I agree with what you are saying. AND, what a way to scan for snipers!!! If it has ... by bowser 2012-03-12 17:54:18
    • I think crowd control is more what they had in mind. by ER 2012-03-12 18:46:59
    • True, true. I always hate it when people praise new "non-lethal" weapons. If it can be used to harm ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-12 14:41:10

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register