• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Season 3 - Foundation BuckGalaxy August 2, 2025 12:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Shoot the messenger BuckGalaxy August 1, 2025 2:00 pm (CurrentEvents)

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Why Trump Can’t Shake Jeffrey Epstein BuckGalaxy July 18, 2025 8:07 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » CurrentEvents

Is Social Security Really "Exhausted"? April 27, 2012 8:07 am ER

“After 2033, even if Congress does nothing, there will still be sufficient assets (from payroll taxes) to pay about 75 percent of benefits. That’s not acceptable, but it’s still a fact that there will still be substantial assets there”
Michael Astrue – Social Security Administration Commissioner

“But Astrue went out of his way to emphasize that the program is far from broke. Social Security took in $69 billion more than it spent last year, according to the report, when you include tax receipts and interest on bonds held in the Social Security Trust Fund (SSTF). The SSTF had reserves of $2.7 trillion last year.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/social-security-really-exhausted-not-175539433.html

Read the article. All the myths are exploded. There’s plenty of time and money to reform Social Security for long-term solvency…unless you have a vested interest in making it go away.

But why would anyone have a vested image in making it go away?

1) Lower Taxes for the rich, who figure they don’t need SS so they see no need to pay for their share of it; as well as no contributions to Social Security payroll witholdings from employers.

2) Less workers retiring means they’ll be desperate for income, have to stay on the job longer, helping keep competition for jobs and unemployment up and therefore, salaries down.

3)Privatization of pensions, providing a lucrative “business opportunity” to the stock market and other financial parasites, not to mention a bottomless source of cash for those who get rich investing other people’s money. What could possibly go wrong with that, eh? You’ll recall the GOP was pushing hard for privatization just before stocks and real estate crashed during the Bush era.

Follow the money.

  • Social Security Exhaustion: by TB 2012-04-30 15:30:28
    • I think you missed the point of my post. by ER 2012-05-02 06:49:21
      • You're evading the issue. Just like the Democrats. by TB 2012-05-02 08:59:50
        • Just for information by TB 2012-05-02 09:14:39
          • No one is denying there's a problem. by ER 2012-05-02 09:21:56
            • "We've got nothing but we don't like your solutions" is getting old. by TB 2012-05-02 09:32:29
              • That's not the way a reasonable person would see it. by ER 2012-05-02 09:56:34
      • Fixed. Finally. by TB 2012-04-30 15:34:43

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register