<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cautionary tale for software writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2012/05/06/cautionary-tale-for-software-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/06/cautionary-tale-for-software-writers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:41:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/06/cautionary-tale-for-software-writers/#comment-14709</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14645#comment-14709</guid>
		<description>So far I&#039;ve only seen the feature in Firefox. I guess in response to Firefox&#039;s idea, there&#039;s now a CSS property to make some boxes resizable, so eventually the other browsers will pick it up. But for now it&#039;s only textareas in FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I&#8217;ve only seen the feature in Firefox. I guess in response to Firefox&#8217;s idea, there&#8217;s now a CSS property to make some boxes resizable, so eventually the other browsers will pick it up. But for now it&#8217;s only textareas in FF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobVG</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/06/cautionary-tale-for-software-writers/#comment-14700</link>
		<dc:creator>RobVG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14645#comment-14700</guid>
		<description>cool. Looking forward to when the post form looks the same way. :)

Or such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool. Looking forward to when the post form looks the same way. <img src='https://habitablezone.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Or such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/06/cautionary-tale-for-software-writers/#comment-14699</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14645#comment-14699</guid>
		<description>Which in turn comes from the adoption of handheld devices, which must be usable one-handed because &quot;handheld&quot; ties up the other hand acting as a support.

The theory behind changing desktop OSes to match the mobiles is, ironically, in pursuit of the ideal that you espouse: Standardization; minimization of variety in user interfaces that must be learned. The mobiles aren&#039;t going away and they won&#039;t be equipped with antigravity stands and holographic two-handed keyboards any time soon, so the one-handed gestural interface is going to become the new standard. End of story. For about a decade.

User interface designers pursue the Holy Grail of the user interface that you don&#039;t notice, and that you don&#039;t have to be taught. For decades that was thought to be based on literalism and icons that supposedly depict real objects: Folders, pencils, documents, ad nauseum. You&#039;re right that it&#039;s fallen short of the goal. Icons turn out to be culturally-specific, as well as just damn difficult to make communicate an idea in a few dozen pixels.

The mobiles seem to be headed toward a different kind of literalism, based on touching...&quot;touching&quot; things through the touchscreen and gestures, even if the things you manipulate are more abstract. I don&#039;t know if your Kindle has the full Android interface, but if so, I&#039;m talking about things like sliding panes left and right, or best of all, two-dimensional scrolling that feels like you&#039;re sliding a piece of paper around on a table top. About the only equivalent to a mouse that I can think of is that a click is equivalent to a finger-tap. Everything else is a new kind of interaction.

I hate to break this to you, but I&#039;m working on redesigning the Zone UI along these more modern lines. In part I&#039;m looking ahead and seeing that in a few years UIs won&#039;t be based on point-and-click, and OSes like Windows 8 are going to force me to adapt. But also, of course, now that I have a device with 1024x600 screen and a gestural interface, I&#039;m looking forward to the challenge of creating a new UI for the Zone that looks good on my Galaxy Tab.

You&#039;ll have plenty of opportunity to get your hands on the prototypes and give me feedback. At the moment all I have is a mockup that doesn&#039;t display live message data. Give it a week or two. I promise it won&#039;t be a horrible experience for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which in turn comes from the adoption of handheld devices, which must be usable one-handed because &#8220;handheld&#8221; ties up the other hand acting as a support.</p>
<p>The theory behind changing desktop OSes to match the mobiles is, ironically, in pursuit of the ideal that you espouse: Standardization; minimization of variety in user interfaces that must be learned. The mobiles aren&#8217;t going away and they won&#8217;t be equipped with antigravity stands and holographic two-handed keyboards any time soon, so the one-handed gestural interface is going to become the new standard. End of story. For about a decade.</p>
<p>User interface designers pursue the Holy Grail of the user interface that you don&#8217;t notice, and that you don&#8217;t have to be taught. For decades that was thought to be based on literalism and icons that supposedly depict real objects: Folders, pencils, documents, ad nauseum. You&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s fallen short of the goal. Icons turn out to be culturally-specific, as well as just damn difficult to make communicate an idea in a few dozen pixels.</p>
<p>The mobiles seem to be headed toward a different kind of literalism, based on touching&#8230;&#8221;touching&#8221; things through the touchscreen and gestures, even if the things you manipulate are more abstract. I don&#8217;t know if your Kindle has the full Android interface, but if so, I&#8217;m talking about things like sliding panes left and right, or best of all, two-dimensional scrolling that feels like you&#8217;re sliding a piece of paper around on a table top. About the only equivalent to a mouse that I can think of is that a click is equivalent to a finger-tap. Everything else is a new kind of interaction.</p>
<p>I hate to break this to you, but I&#8217;m working on redesigning the Zone UI along these more modern lines. In part I&#8217;m looking ahead and seeing that in a few years UIs won&#8217;t be based on point-and-click, and OSes like Windows 8 are going to force me to adapt. But also, of course, now that I have a device with 1024&#215;600 screen and a gestural interface, I&#8217;m looking forward to the challenge of creating a new UI for the Zone that looks good on my Galaxy Tab.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have plenty of opportunity to get your hands on the prototypes and give me feedback. At the moment all I have is a mockup that doesn&#8217;t display live message data. Give it a week or two. I promise it won&#8217;t be a horrible experience for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
