<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Female Breasts II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2012/05/07/female-breasts-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/07/female-breasts-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:41:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/07/female-breasts-ii/#comment-14716</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14665#comment-14716</guid>
		<description>The point I&#039;m trying to make is that it is possible to prove one of us may prefer slender girls, or tall girls, while the others prefers curvaceous, or small girls. But it is impossible to prove which one of us prefers prettier girls.  It&#039;s a different kind of question, and it doesn&#039;t really have an answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point I&#8217;m trying to make is that it is possible to prove one of us may prefer slender girls, or tall girls, while the others prefers curvaceous, or small girls. But it is impossible to prove which one of us prefers prettier girls.  It&#8217;s a different kind of question, and it doesn&#8217;t really have an answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckGalaxy</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/07/female-breasts-ii/#comment-14715</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckGalaxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 06:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14665#comment-14715</guid>
		<description>I think I know where you are going with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I know where you are going with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/05/07/female-breasts-ii/#comment-14714</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=14665#comment-14714</guid>
		<description>Having been single for over 30 years now, I have to confess to some experience with this subject.  I&#039;ve had a series of monogamous relationships, and the benefit of learning at the feet, ankles, calves, etc. and so on of more than a few loving and patient women.  Some I would have married, some would have married me, and some I would have and they would have but not at the same time.

I prefer women slender and proportionate.  Breasts which are too big are not OK.  Breasts which are to small are acceptable.  What really matters is if I like the woman.  After that, my favorite section is whichever I&#039;m engaged with at the moment.  That includes all the obvious, as well as attributes such sense of humor or intellect.  What&#039;s attractive is what&#039;s at hand, so to speak.

A woman is a whole body and mind project, with each melding and meshing with the other and mine.  It&#039;s how well that process works which determines the satisfaction with the process and outcome.  That&#039;s most of the time.

There are  other times, such as in the morning with a tight schedule, when by mutual agreement it is every body for itself.  A selfishness takes over and some of the rules take a brief vacation.  But that&#039;s only after some time and familiarity.

Now, back to the point.  I&#039;m not sure how to separate the parts out.  They all have their attraction and appeal in their order and I think a certain attitude and light-heartedness can trigger what the physicality by itself can&#039;t.  What will catch my eye is a smile, ankles, rear, chest and hair, not necessarily in any order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been single for over 30 years now, I have to confess to some experience with this subject.  I&#8217;ve had a series of monogamous relationships, and the benefit of learning at the feet, ankles, calves, etc. and so on of more than a few loving and patient women.  Some I would have married, some would have married me, and some I would have and they would have but not at the same time.</p>
<p>I prefer women slender and proportionate.  Breasts which are too big are not OK.  Breasts which are to small are acceptable.  What really matters is if I like the woman.  After that, my favorite section is whichever I&#8217;m engaged with at the moment.  That includes all the obvious, as well as attributes such sense of humor or intellect.  What&#8217;s attractive is what&#8217;s at hand, so to speak.</p>
<p>A woman is a whole body and mind project, with each melding and meshing with the other and mine.  It&#8217;s how well that process works which determines the satisfaction with the process and outcome.  That&#8217;s most of the time.</p>
<p>There are  other times, such as in the morning with a tight schedule, when by mutual agreement it is every body for itself.  A selfishness takes over and some of the rules take a brief vacation.  But that&#8217;s only after some time and familiarity.</p>
<p>Now, back to the point.  I&#8217;m not sure how to separate the parts out.  They all have their attraction and appeal in their order and I think a certain attitude and light-heartedness can trigger what the physicality by itself can&#8217;t.  What will catch my eye is a smile, ankles, rear, chest and hair, not necessarily in any order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
