<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;jes sayin&#8217;&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 12:03:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/#comment-16683</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=18838#comment-16683</guid>
		<description>Their definition of &quot;unprecedented&quot; might need some work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their definition of &#8220;unprecedented&#8221; might need some work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckGalaxy</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/#comment-16682</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckGalaxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=18838#comment-16682</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s to hoping...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/#comment-16680</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=18838#comment-16680</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;blockquote&gt;There has been lots of talk lately about Antarctica and whether or not the continent&#039;s giant ice sheet is melting. One new paper 1, which states there’s less surface melting recently than in past years, has been cited as &quot;proof&quot; that there’s no global warming. Other evidence that the amount of sea ice around Antarctica seems to be increasing slightly 2-4 is being used in the same way. But both of these data points are misleading. Gravity data collected from space using NASA&#039;s Grace satellite show that Antarctica has been losing more than a hundred cubic kilometers (24 cubic miles) of ice each year since 2002. The latest data reveal that Antarctica is losing ice at an accelerating rate, too. How is it possible for surface melting to decrease, but for the continent to lose mass anyway? The answer boils down to the fact that ice can flow without melting. &lt;/blockquote&gt;



&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/416685main_20100108_Climate_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;.&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>There has been lots of talk lately about Antarctica and whether or not the continent&#8217;s giant ice sheet is melting. One new paper 1, which states there’s less surface melting recently than in past years, has been cited as &#8220;proof&#8221; that there’s no global warming. Other evidence that the amount of sea ice around Antarctica seems to be increasing slightly 2-4 is being used in the same way. But both of these data points are misleading. Gravity data collected from space using NASA&#8217;s Grace satellite show that Antarctica has been losing more than a hundred cubic kilometers (24 cubic miles) of ice each year since 2002. The latest data reveal that Antarctica is losing ice at an accelerating rate, too. How is it possible for surface melting to decrease, but for the continent to lose mass anyway? The answer boils down to the fact that ice can flow without melting. </p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/416685main_20100108_Climate_1.jpg" alt="." /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankC</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2012/07/25/jes-sayin-2/#comment-16676</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=18838#comment-16676</guid>
		<description>Human contribution to that change is undeniable.

Sadly if you filled a stadium with scientists/experts you would not arrive at a consensus on what the ultimate effects of the change will be.

Maybe someone should plot a normal curve and publish the result, assuming you could get a sufficient number of experts to submit an opinion without ifs and buts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human contribution to that change is undeniable.</p>
<p>Sadly if you filled a stadium with scientists/experts you would not arrive at a consensus on what the ultimate effects of the change will be.</p>
<p>Maybe someone should plot a normal curve and publish the result, assuming you could get a sufficient number of experts to submit an opinion without ifs and buts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
