• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Why Trump Can’t Shake Jeffrey Epstein BuckGalaxy July 18, 2025 8:07 pm (CurrentEvents)

Colbert cancelled. ER July 17, 2025 8:20 pm (CurrentEvents)

just passin' thru... ER July 16, 2025 2:08 pm (Space/Science)

Home » Space/Science

Watching the various renditions of the Curiosity landing. August 15, 2012 10:25 pm bowser

I can’t help but be in total awe of the folks who accepted that challenge, decided that landing out of Earth’s control was feasible, chose a cockamammie method of touching down, and used the same computer for cruise, landing and science.

While comparisons are unfair, this seems to be much more of an accomplishment than the first Moon landing, which was under human control the entire way.

I don’t think there is a soul associated with Curiosity who doesn’t deserve the highest credit.  And thank God for the committee – no one in their right mind, no one person, could have suggested all of that and remained loose.  It took great minds reinforcing each other to put it all together.

A bit slow, I am, and mightily impressed.

Arf

  • Landing out of Earth's control wasn't a choice. by TB 2012-08-16 06:36:20
    • Hopefully not to logic-chop the point to death by bowser 2012-08-16 17:05:05

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register