Comments on: Patraeus slams the door on conspiracy theorists

By: TB

TB — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:39:32 +0000

That’s another issue entirely.

By: BuckGalaxy

BuckGalaxy — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:29:05 +0000

What I’ve stated all along is if you want to criticize anything, then talk about inadequate security. But you guys just WANT there to be a conspiracy so bad it is, truly, pitiful.

“The general was adamant there was no politicization of the process, no White House interference or political agenda,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. “He completely debunked that idea.”

But Republicans remain critical of the administration’s handling of the case. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said Petraeus’ testimony showed that “clearly the security measures were inadequate despite an overwhelming and growing amount of information that showed the area in Benghazi was dangerous, particularly on the night of Sept. 11.”

By: BuckGalaxy

BuckGalaxy — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:23:22 +0000

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) noted that Petraeus “was adamant there was no politicization of the process, no White House interference or political agenda. He completely debunked that idea.”

By: TB

TB — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:21:20 +0000

The New York Times article

Is here. Contradictions and all. You don't need it filtered through somebody's kidneys.

By: RobVG

RobVG — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:35:00 +0000

Hey, if posting from Fox is out of bounds for us, please don’t refer to Maddow. n/t.

By: RobVG

RobVG — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:32:50 +0000

It’d be nice if there was a transcript somewhere