• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Already gutted, the CDC faces more brutal cuts RL October 11, 2025 9:45 pm (Space/Science)

A.Indecency RL October 11, 2025 9:37 pm (GeekSpeak)

Dark matter stars RL October 11, 2025 9:01 pm (Space/Science)

R-E-S-P-E-C-T BuckGalaxy October 11, 2025 12:52 pm (Flame)

Fly like an eagle BuckGalaxy October 10, 2025 2:58 pm (CurrentEvents)

Uploading personal photos. One last time.. RobVG October 10, 2025 2:51 pm (GeekSpeak)

Where we are now RL October 8, 2025 6:02 pm (CurrentEvents)

Blasphemy RL October 7, 2025 2:40 pm (Space/Science)

I cannot listen podrock October 5, 2025 9:27 am (CurrentEvents)

Down Under Report ER October 2, 2025 5:41 pm (Space/Science)

The 3 Body Problem (Spoilers) RobVG October 2, 2025 8:04 am (Science Fiction)

The Expanse is back! BuckGalaxy September 25, 2025 11:21 am (Science Fiction)

Home » Space/Science

Asteroid mining December 7, 2012 2:29 pm TB

A sort of continuation of the discussion below, which was creeping off my screen.

A short thought experiment I did some years back.

That’s a lot of money for just one asteroid.

Large quantities of resources are best moved through space on slow orbits, in a train of intermittent launches to create a “pipeline.” Think coal moving on trains across a continent. Mass drivers can launch simple metals and ores from asteroids, and theoretically a “mass catcher” can retrieve them at the other end, although this is tricky. Atmospheric braking of giant masses of metal is not something I’d like to bring up to an insurance company. The more refining and “cooking down” you can do onsite, the less the transportation becomes an issue.

  • Something the earlier thread overlooked: Energy. by podrock 2012-12-07 15:50:24

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register