<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wolfram alpha, anyone using it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2013/01/20/wolfram-alpha-anyone-using-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/01/20/wolfram-alpha-anyone-using-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 17:51:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/01/20/wolfram-alpha-anyone-using-it/#comment-22696</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=29885#comment-22696</guid>
		<description>As long as it isn&#039;t Wolfram and Hart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as it isn&#8217;t Wolfram and Hart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/01/20/wolfram-alpha-anyone-using-it/#comment-22695</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=29885#comment-22695</guid>
		<description>The name &quot;Wolfram&quot; is kind of familiar. They&#039;re known historically for software called &quot;Mathematica&quot;, apparently a formula-solver on steroids, that&#039;s been popular with scientists and mathematicians and engineers for decades. An additional little factoid I came across while browsing their Web site is that Wolfram-alpha is &quot;part&quot; of the engine powering Apple&#039;s Siri.

I was able to try out Wolfram-Alpha at its Web site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wolframalpha.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.wolframalpha.com&lt;/a&gt;). I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d call it a &quot;search engine&quot;, exactly. More like a &quot;reference desk&quot; or &quot;oracle&quot; like Siri. Big difference is that it didn&#039;t produce a long list of links to other Web pages, it attempted to answer my question right then and there. That&#039;s likely to be good and bad depending on the query. When I entered my name, it just proceeded to analyze the frequency of my first and last name in the population. (Bit of a downer, BTW: Almost nobody is being named &quot;Robert&quot; any more. It&#039;s like the name is being erased from history.) It wasn&#039;t obvious how I could have reworded my query to get more search-engine-like results; where on a search engine, I already know various ways to vary my search terms or order, stuff like that, to narrow-in on what I&#039;m looking for.

I suspect everybody does this on all new search thingies: &quot;What is the meaning of life?&quot; This really showed its bias toward finding the one right answer: It assumed I meant Douglas Adams&#039; form of the question, and gave me &quot;42&quot; and a two-sentence explanation of the source, but also offered to switch to the Monty Python meaning of life question. Very Siri-like.

There&#039;s an Android app as well as Apple, and apparently a downloadable PC program (how retro!). It&#039;s funny, you&#039;d think I wouldn&#039;t hesitate to drop $2.99 to try it out...but I guess I worry about app purchases getting away from me, and finding myself having spent hundreds of bucks on hundreds of apps I don&#039;t need. Buying an app is dangerously easy through those app stores. So I&#039;m going to see what you and others have to say. But I&#039;m leaning toward buying it.

Interesting find, Frank. Glad you brought it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name &#8220;Wolfram&#8221; is kind of familiar. They&#8217;re known historically for software called &#8220;Mathematica&#8221;, apparently a formula-solver on steroids, that&#8217;s been popular with scientists and mathematicians and engineers for decades. An additional little factoid I came across while browsing their Web site is that Wolfram-alpha is &#8220;part&#8221; of the engine powering Apple&#8217;s Siri.</p>
<p>I was able to try out Wolfram-Alpha at its Web site (<a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wolframalpha.com</a>). I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d call it a &#8220;search engine&#8221;, exactly. More like a &#8220;reference desk&#8221; or &#8220;oracle&#8221; like Siri. Big difference is that it didn&#8217;t produce a long list of links to other Web pages, it attempted to answer my question right then and there. That&#8217;s likely to be good and bad depending on the query. When I entered my name, it just proceeded to analyze the frequency of my first and last name in the population. (Bit of a downer, BTW: Almost nobody is being named &#8220;Robert&#8221; any more. It&#8217;s like the name is being erased from history.) It wasn&#8217;t obvious how I could have reworded my query to get more search-engine-like results; where on a search engine, I already know various ways to vary my search terms or order, stuff like that, to narrow-in on what I&#8217;m looking for.</p>
<p>I suspect everybody does this on all new search thingies: &#8220;What is the meaning of life?&#8221; This really showed its bias toward finding the one right answer: It assumed I meant Douglas Adams&#8217; form of the question, and gave me &#8220;42&#8243; and a two-sentence explanation of the source, but also offered to switch to the Monty Python meaning of life question. Very Siri-like.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an Android app as well as Apple, and apparently a downloadable PC program (how retro!). It&#8217;s funny, you&#8217;d think I wouldn&#8217;t hesitate to drop $2.99 to try it out&#8230;but I guess I worry about app purchases getting away from me, and finding myself having spent hundreds of bucks on hundreds of apps I don&#8217;t need. Buying an app is dangerously easy through those app stores. So I&#8217;m going to see what you and others have to say. But I&#8217;m leaning toward buying it.</p>
<p>Interesting find, Frank. Glad you brought it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
