<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark asteroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:51:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcaray</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/#comment-24403</link>
		<dc:creator>alcaray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 05:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=33389#comment-24403</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/#comment-24398</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 02:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=33389#comment-24398</guid>
		<description>No one&#039;s here&#039;s ever said that for as long as I&#039;ve been coming here, and I know that astronomers have long suspected that planets were a routine by-product of star formation and were probably very common.  

In fact, long before we found the first one, people were looking very hard trying to find ways to do so. When I was an astronomy student 40 years ago one of the graduate students&#039; theses was about a device he was developing to detect wobbles in star positions caused by extrasolar planets.  Van de Kamp, a leading astrometrist, suggested Barnard&#039;s Star as having planets as far back as the late 30s.  It turned out he was mistaken about this particular star, but his report was taken seriously and cited frequently in the literature.

I think your memory is of the &quot;scientists have proven bumblebees can&#039;t fly&quot; variety. That old chestnut never happened either. It&#039;s a way of demonstrating how stupid scientists are which can then be used to show that something else they are skeptical about must be true. (Somewhat like UFOs today.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one&#8217;s here&#8217;s ever said that for as long as I&#8217;ve been coming here, and I know that astronomers have long suspected that planets were a routine by-product of star formation and were probably very common.  </p>
<p>In fact, long before we found the first one, people were looking very hard trying to find ways to do so. When I was an astronomy student 40 years ago one of the graduate students&#8217; theses was about a device he was developing to detect wobbles in star positions caused by extrasolar planets.  Van de Kamp, a leading astrometrist, suggested Barnard&#8217;s Star as having planets as far back as the late 30s.  It turned out he was mistaken about this particular star, but his report was taken seriously and cited frequently in the literature.</p>
<p>I think your memory is of the &#8220;scientists have proven bumblebees can&#8217;t fly&#8221; variety. That old chestnut never happened either. It&#8217;s a way of demonstrating how stupid scientists are which can then be used to show that something else they are skeptical about must be true. (Somewhat like UFOs today.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johannes</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/#comment-24397</link>
		<dc:creator>johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=33389#comment-24397</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m only remembering that some years ago there were some people on these boards that were of the opinion that our solar system was the only place that planets could exist, their reasoning seemed to be that; since no other planets were confirmed to be out there, then they can not exist.
(Somewhat like UFO&#039;s today.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m only remembering that some years ago there were some people on these boards that were of the opinion that our solar system was the only place that planets could exist, their reasoning seemed to be that; since no other planets were confirmed to be out there, then they can not exist.<br />
(Somewhat like UFO&#8217;s today.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcaray</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/05/31/dark-asteroid/#comment-24341</link>
		<dc:creator>alcaray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 03:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=33389#comment-24341</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t been convinced of the commonness of et planets by all the et planets we&#039;ve found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t been convinced of the commonness of et planets by all the et planets we&#8217;ve found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
