<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naked eye nova in Delphinus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:18:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26486</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 21:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26486</guid>
		<description>Pity you, Rob and I don&#039;t live closer together, we could have a star party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity you, Rob and I don&#8217;t live closer together, we could have a star party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26474</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26474</guid>
		<description>That night I star hopped right where the nova should be and starred and starred and starred and....for a very long time and saw a fuzzy light. The photo I took confirms the location where I was observing but when you take a 25 second image you produce objects you don&#039;t see as well through limited optics and the fuzzy star I saw didn&#039;t look as prominent as the one in the photo. 

Hey we did our best for the short window and thanks for getting me out for the challenge. I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That night I star hopped right where the nova should be and starred and starred and starred and&#8230;.for a very long time and saw a fuzzy light. The photo I took confirms the location where I was observing but when you take a 25 second image you produce objects you don&#8217;t see as well through limited optics and the fuzzy star I saw didn&#8217;t look as prominent as the one in the photo. </p>
<p>Hey we did our best for the short window and thanks for getting me out for the challenge. I enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26449</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure now the star I mentioned in my earlier report was not the nova.

I finally got a good clear night, and I broke out the heavy metal, my 11x80 binoculars. Using your AAVSO finder chart and my Millennium Atlas I was able to star hop right to the spot--and there was nothing there.  It must have dimmed below my limiting magnitude (around 9 or 10).  I know I was in the right spot because Millennium shows a mag 7 or 8 star about 6&#039; N at the same RA, which I could easily see, but there was nothing else there.

As a consolation prize, I did get a satellite (about mag 4) slowly creeping through the field, headed E, alternately brightening and dimming as it tumbled through space.  It was spooky. It must have been high up there, because it was moving very slowly and was still catching sunlight at 10 PM local time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure now the star I mentioned in my earlier report was not the nova.</p>
<p>I finally got a good clear night, and I broke out the heavy metal, my 11&#215;80 binoculars. Using your AAVSO finder chart and my Millennium Atlas I was able to star hop right to the spot&#8211;and there was nothing there.  It must have dimmed below my limiting magnitude (around 9 or 10).  I know I was in the right spot because Millennium shows a mag 7 or 8 star about 6&#8242; N at the same RA, which I could easily see, but there was nothing else there.</p>
<p>As a consolation prize, I did get a satellite (about mag 4) slowly creeping through the field, headed E, alternately brightening and dimming as it tumbled through space.  It was spooky. It must have been high up there, because it was moving very slowly and was still catching sunlight at 10 PM local time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26426</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 05:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26426</guid>
		<description>Took this 25 second 35mm image and it confirms the nova, abeit faint if you ask me. I held the star chart up against it and it seems to match. The arrow is where I think it is.

I have a feeling this nova is fading fast.

&lt;img src=&quot;https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-OFpLPIGT9rM/Uh7VORbQv4I/AAAAAAAAAAo/OKs-updHPns/s512/Nova%252520Del%2525202013.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took this 25 second 35mm image and it confirms the nova, abeit faint if you ask me. I held the star chart up against it and it seems to match. The arrow is where I think it is.</p>
<p>I have a feeling this nova is fading fast.</p>
<p><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-OFpLPIGT9rM/Uh7VORbQv4I/AAAAAAAAAAo/OKs-updHPns/s512/Nova%252520Del%2525202013.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26407</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26407</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had continuous overcasts since my first attempt, (Summer monsoon here in FL)and I haven&#039;t had a chance to verify my own sight.  My second attempt a few days later (80 mm spotting scope at 16x) was clouded out just after I located the Delphinus asterism. Above the clouds it is hazy, with lots of urban skyglow. And you&#039;re right, every look at the chart blinds you.

I used the charts on the S&amp;T website and Sky Atlas, Uranometria, and Millennium, but because of the awkward observing position, almost directly overhead. I&#039;ve had trouble twisting myself into a position where I could both observe and use the charts comfortably.

I don&#039;t recall any &quot;fuzziness&quot; in the star I observed, but it looked distinctly yellowish to me.  Can you confirm? My eyes are 66 years old, and my fast refractors poorly color-corrected.

It never occured to me to download the AAVSO Binoc chart, it is optimum for just this application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had continuous overcasts since my first attempt, (Summer monsoon here in FL)and I haven&#8217;t had a chance to verify my own sight.  My second attempt a few days later (80 mm spotting scope at 16x) was clouded out just after I located the Delphinus asterism. Above the clouds it is hazy, with lots of urban skyglow. And you&#8217;re right, every look at the chart blinds you.</p>
<p>I used the charts on the S&amp;T website and Sky Atlas, Uranometria, and Millennium, but because of the awkward observing position, almost directly overhead. I&#8217;ve had trouble twisting myself into a position where I could both observe and use the charts comfortably.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall any &#8220;fuzziness&#8221; in the star I observed, but it looked distinctly yellowish to me.  Can you confirm? My eyes are 66 years old, and my fast refractors poorly color-corrected.</p>
<p>It never occured to me to download the AAVSO Binoc chart, it is optimum for just this application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26406</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26406</guid>
		<description>I went out with the binoculars and this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aavso.org/sites/default/files/Nova%20Del%202013%20Bino%20chart%20mag%207.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; star chart at 10pm to see if I could locate Nova Del 2013. With Delphinus as my starting point I used the 2 center stars of its diamond as a straight line of sight up to where the nova should be. After rechecking the chart a couple times to make sure I was in the right area and letting my eyes adjust after being blinded by the light used for the chart I finally found the nova. Dimmer and fuzzier than I expected but it was there right where the chart showed. There is a distinct group of stars a little lower and to the left of the nova which make the find easier.

Think I&#039;ll set the camera up and try and get a picture this week to confirm my sighting and see if I can bring out some details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went out with the binoculars and this <a href="http://www.aavso.org/sites/default/files/Nova%20Del%202013%20Bino%20chart%20mag%207.png" rel="nofollow">this</a> star chart at 10pm to see if I could locate Nova Del 2013. With Delphinus as my starting point I used the 2 center stars of its diamond as a straight line of sight up to where the nova should be. After rechecking the chart a couple times to make sure I was in the right area and letting my eyes adjust after being blinded by the light used for the chart I finally found the nova. Dimmer and fuzzier than I expected but it was there right where the chart showed. There is a distinct group of stars a little lower and to the left of the nova which make the find easier.</p>
<p>Think I&#8217;ll set the camera up and try and get a picture this week to confirm my sighting and see if I can bring out some details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26355</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to give it a try. Not sure my location is dark enough but it sounds like fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to give it a try. Not sure my location is dark enough but it sounds like fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26241</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 03:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26241</guid>
		<description>I used my 10x50 monocular since conditions didn&#039;t justify the scope, and the nova was bright enough to be visible in the glass.

Everything went wrong.

As Napoleon once said, all major battles are fought where four maps come together.  None of my atlases showed the entire field, and if they did, it was at the wrong scale.  Uranometria showed too many stars, and Sky Atlas didn&#039;t show enough. On top of that, the moon and the streetlights washed everything out, and the nova is almost directly overhead at my latitude, so I couldn&#039;t get comfortable to search for it without lying flat on the ground.  

The nearest naked-eye landmark was the little asterism of Delphinus, but it was invisible to the naked eye in the glare, although I did manage to find it in the glass. On top of that, there were clouds. So I couldn&#039;t look for more than a few minutes without gettng interrupted.

Then there was the problem of consulting the charts, which required fumbling with a flashlight and reading glasses, lying down and getting up and leaning over to read them.  AAAARGH.

But I think I saw it.  A little star that looked just like all the others...I think I was looking in the right place... where the charts said nothing should be.   

Wow.  I&#039;ve never seen a nova before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used my 10&#215;50 monocular since conditions didn&#8217;t justify the scope, and the nova was bright enough to be visible in the glass.</p>
<p>Everything went wrong.</p>
<p>As Napoleon once said, all major battles are fought where four maps come together.  None of my atlases showed the entire field, and if they did, it was at the wrong scale.  Uranometria showed too many stars, and Sky Atlas didn&#8217;t show enough. On top of that, the moon and the streetlights washed everything out, and the nova is almost directly overhead at my latitude, so I couldn&#8217;t get comfortable to search for it without lying flat on the ground.  </p>
<p>The nearest naked-eye landmark was the little asterism of Delphinus, but it was invisible to the naked eye in the glare, although I did manage to find it in the glass. On top of that, there were clouds. So I couldn&#8217;t look for more than a few minutes without gettng interrupted.</p>
<p>Then there was the problem of consulting the charts, which required fumbling with a flashlight and reading glasses, lying down and getting up and leaning over to read them.  AAAARGH.</p>
<p>But I think I saw it.  A little star that looked just like all the others&#8230;I think I was looking in the right place&#8230; where the charts said nothing should be.   </p>
<p>Wow.  I&#8217;ve never seen a nova before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobVG</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/08/19/naked-eye-nova-in-delphinus/#comment-26237</link>
		<dc:creator>RobVG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://habitablezone.com/?p=36844#comment-26237</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
