<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political tensions endanger Nigerians &#8211; Obama does nothing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:18:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/#comment-26800</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=37775#comment-26800</guid>
		<description>So you don&#039;t have to worry about him helping the needy begging for peace and aid around the world.    
The problem with Syria is that Obama said in 2011 that Assad must go and was under the impression he was on his way out, giving the rebels hope. Then Obama talks of a red line that would all but cement a reason to confront Assad with force, giving the rebels more hope. 

Obama should have kept his mouth shut if he was going to let hundreds of thousands of people die over 2 years and let Assad get away with using WMD on his own people.

I for one don&#039;t have a clue as to what our policies are going to be for people wishing for freedom and democracy around the world anymore and not sure I can trust what they say. You can bet the people crying for help probably feel the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you don&#8217;t have to worry about him helping the needy begging for peace and aid around the world.<br />
The problem with Syria is that Obama said in 2011 that Assad must go and was under the impression he was on his way out, giving the rebels hope. Then Obama talks of a red line that would all but cement a reason to confront Assad with force, giving the rebels more hope. </p>
<p>Obama should have kept his mouth shut if he was going to let hundreds of thousands of people die over 2 years and let Assad get away with using WMD on his own people.</p>
<p>I for one don&#8217;t have a clue as to what our policies are going to be for people wishing for freedom and democracy around the world anymore and not sure I can trust what they say. You can bet the people crying for help probably feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/#comment-26756</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=37775#comment-26756</guid>
		<description>Every word is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every word is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/#comment-26750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=37775#comment-26750</guid>
		<description>Dull inquiring minds need to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dull inquiring minds need to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2013/09/14/political-tensions-endanger-nigerians-obama-does-nothing/#comment-26748</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.habitablezone.com/?p=37775#comment-26748</guid>
		<description>Now that I&#039;ve had a chance to think it over, I have concluded that so far Obama has handled the Syria situation remarkably well.  After Syria used NBC weapons in March, he had to draw a red line to stop them from using them again. It was essential to do something, not only for humanitarian reasons and pressure from our Sunni allies in the region, but to make sure future US demands about NBC weapons directed at others would be credible. Iran and N Korea are watching,

When the Syrians called his bluff, he prepared for war, but the Congress and the American people clearly don&#039;t want any part of that, and he has little (public) international support. His hands were tied, and rightly so.  If he were to employ force now it would be an impeachable offense, and I would reluctantly have to vote for conviction.  Presidents should not have the authority to unilaterally declare war except under circumstances of direct and imminent threat.  This is not one of them.

Holding no good cards, Obama has been playing a very weak hand extremely well, improvising as he goes along, but has still managed to make remarkable progress.  The Syrians and their allies have already made astounding admissions and concessions.  Of course, there is no practical way to ensure and verify a chemical disarmament of Syria, even if Assad were sincere about doing so, but American interests will still be served if Syria never uses those weapons again, which now seems possible, if not likely.  The humanitarian goal is achieved, and American credibility for future reprises of this situation is preserved. That would be a great victory for us.

Of course, Obama&#039;s critics will call him weak and indecisive, while denying him the one option that can allow him to act decisively, even if he never exercises it.  If he had acted without asking for Congressional approval, he would have been attacked from Left, Right and abroad, by friend and foe alike. (At least, in public). If he strikes Syria without approval he will most likely be impeached--and deservedly so. And any strike can do little of practical value but allow the US to save face, even though it may cost him his Presidency.

There&#039;s no telling how this will turn out, and there&#039;s no way of knowing what we should do next, or what we should have done before to avoid this dilemma. Its no accident that Obama&#039;s critics on this board have been remarkably silent during this crisis, only you, Bowser, has taken a stand.  I don&#039;t agree with it, but I respect your having stuck your neck out.

As for Obama&#039;s critics in the nation,  there&#039;s nothing he could have done that would have met with their approval, nothing he can do now that they will support, and no resolution of this crisis that will satisfy them.  So screw &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I&#8217;ve had a chance to think it over, I have concluded that so far Obama has handled the Syria situation remarkably well.  After Syria used NBC weapons in March, he had to draw a red line to stop them from using them again. It was essential to do something, not only for humanitarian reasons and pressure from our Sunni allies in the region, but to make sure future US demands about NBC weapons directed at others would be credible. Iran and N Korea are watching,</p>
<p>When the Syrians called his bluff, he prepared for war, but the Congress and the American people clearly don&#8217;t want any part of that, and he has little (public) international support. His hands were tied, and rightly so.  If he were to employ force now it would be an impeachable offense, and I would reluctantly have to vote for conviction.  Presidents should not have the authority to unilaterally declare war except under circumstances of direct and imminent threat.  This is not one of them.</p>
<p>Holding no good cards, Obama has been playing a very weak hand extremely well, improvising as he goes along, but has still managed to make remarkable progress.  The Syrians and their allies have already made astounding admissions and concessions.  Of course, there is no practical way to ensure and verify a chemical disarmament of Syria, even if Assad were sincere about doing so, but American interests will still be served if Syria never uses those weapons again, which now seems possible, if not likely.  The humanitarian goal is achieved, and American credibility for future reprises of this situation is preserved. That would be a great victory for us.</p>
<p>Of course, Obama&#8217;s critics will call him weak and indecisive, while denying him the one option that can allow him to act decisively, even if he never exercises it.  If he had acted without asking for Congressional approval, he would have been attacked from Left, Right and abroad, by friend and foe alike. (At least, in public). If he strikes Syria without approval he will most likely be impeached&#8211;and deservedly so. And any strike can do little of practical value but allow the US to save face, even though it may cost him his Presidency.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no telling how this will turn out, and there&#8217;s no way of knowing what we should do next, or what we should have done before to avoid this dilemma. Its no accident that Obama&#8217;s critics on this board have been remarkably silent during this crisis, only you, Bowser, has taken a stand.  I don&#8217;t agree with it, but I respect your having stuck your neck out.</p>
<p>As for Obama&#8217;s critics in the nation,  there&#8217;s nothing he could have done that would have met with their approval, nothing he can do now that they will support, and no resolution of this crisis that will satisfy them.  So screw &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
