Have they ever? Basically, you have two consecutive threads here where the obvious has been pointed out about Democratic lies told so they could sell their program, and what the documented truth actually is. So what was the response?

Just to point out again, the predictions in the Forbes article were from the Federal Register, and they were made in 2010 by the administration itself.

These “sacrificed” people, if they take the opportunity to explore the new landscape, will find that some of them are changing to policies that cost the same or cost less. Some of them will find that they qualify for subsidies that make the whining moot (or would if their story was told by an honest spokesperson). *ALL* of them are getting better policies.

The “3” million we’re talking about, the ones whose plans are no longer valid because of the ACA, the people you say should “sacrifice” are not the wealthy. These are the people which were supposed to see their costs go down. Many are turning to their only option- pay the mandate penalty.

Do you think that ignoring the plight of the 14 million without healthcare while stressing over the 3 million who have to change their policies doesn’t have an optical effect? I think I stated the obvious, no?

Gotta laugh…cryin’ won’t help.