• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Highly recommended ER May 23, 2025 9:20 pm (Off-Topic)

At least they didn't waste a perfectly good bottle of champagne BuckGalaxy May 22, 2025 10:31 pm (Flame)

Re-writing history ER May 22, 2025 8:24 pm (CurrentEvents)

Taking a fresh look at terraforming Mars BuckGalaxy May 20, 2025 11:07 am (Space/Science)

the v and d correction ER May 19, 2025 9:49 am (GeekSpeak)

Clearly threatening language BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 3:43 pm (Flame)

Most common planet type in the Galaxy BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:51 pm (Space/Science)

Large Loathsome Legislation fails in committee BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

Large Hadron Collider Eureka! BuckGalaxy May 15, 2025 11:44 am (Space/Science)

Plan(et) 9 from Outer Space BuckGalaxy May 13, 2025 10:58 am (Space/Science)

Shouldn't there be an Afrikaaner-American studies department in our universities? ER May 12, 2025 2:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

Home » CurrentEvents

From the Christian Science Monitor February 7, 2014 12:18 pm ER

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2014/0206/Pat-Robertson-rejects-young-earth-creationism.-Nonsense-he-says.-video

“There ain’t no way that’s possible,” Mr. Robertson said Wednesday on his show, “The 700 Club,” taking issue with the “young earth” version of creationism, which holds that the universe is about 6,000 to 10,000 years old. “We have skeletons of dinosaurs that go back 65 million years,” Robertson said. “To say it all dates back to 6,000 years is just nonsense, and I think [it’s] time we come off of that stuff, and say this isn’t possible.”

“Let’s be real; let’s not make a joke of ourselves,” he said.

He has expressed these views before, in fact, but after the widely anticipated clash between Messrs. Nye and Ham, responses to the televangelist’s comments came quickly on Twitter and other social media sites. Many crowed that even a conservative fundamentalist like Robertson, who helped lead the rise of the religious right since the 1960s, couldn’t agree with Ham’s literalist views. Others saw his comments as a betrayal, if not a form of heresy.

But Tuesday’s debate and Robertson’s reaction underscore the deep cultural ambivalence and complicated history that American Evangelical Protestants have with the science of evolution. Indeed, the issue has haunted the conservative subculture for more than a century, and in many ways it continues to be a touchstone in the diverse intellectual and theological identity of politically powerful Evangelicals.

I predict this is going to cause big trouble on the Right. Although anti-scientific religious fundamentalism is not necessarily a Conservative trait, it is certainly identified with a key constituency on the Right. Once non-Biblical biological theory is allowed, what could be next?

  • The problem seems to be that by johannes 2014-02-07 18:29:15
    • divine inspiration by Robert 2014-02-07 21:51:51
      • Thank you Robert; whether my interpretation was divinely inspired or not, is open for scrutiny. by johannes 2014-02-09 20:14:48
        • inspired one way or another, Johannes ;-) by Robert 2014-02-10 22:06:52
      • Sad. It's worth a headline when a Christian Conservative makes some sense. by bowser 2014-02-07 21:44:34
        • Then again, maybe it doesn't mean anything. by ER 2014-02-07 21:33:01
          • Are you saying that by johannes 2014-02-09 20:18:45
            • Are you saying that the match between modern scientific concepts and the concepts from the old book are a coincidence? by johannes 2014-02-09 20:17:10
              • The coincidence . . . by DanS 2014-02-10 12:23:31
                • I am of the opinion that by johannes 2014-02-10 21:14:23
                  • Nice dodge . . . by DanS 2014-02-11 05:15:17
                • There is no match, so there is no coincidence. by ER 2014-02-09 20:49:11
                  • Unfortunately, science does not understand the mind or the universe, at least by johannes 2014-02-10 21:19:49
                    • Religion is superstitious nonsense. by ER 2014-02-10 21:41:49
                      • Interesting respose. by johannes 2014-02-12 22:00:36
                        • “The Higgs Field is an invisible energy field that exists everywhere in the universe.” by ER 2014-02-13 11:41:02
                          • Yes, Han Solo, But then, you are not a Jedi master. ;-) Yoda by johannes 2014-02-13 14:57:43
                            • Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid. by ER 2014-02-13 20:17:46
                              • Alan Ladd . . . by DanS 2014-02-14 05:26:49
                                • Automatic pistols jam. A .38 is a revolver cartridge. by ER 2014-02-14 06:25:57
                                  • I know . . . by DanS 2014-02-14 07:41:48
                                    • A common Hollywood error. by ER 2014-02-14 09:04:02
                        • Amen by podrock 2014-02-10 23:32:12
                          • :-) by johannes 2014-02-12 22:01:09

              Search

              The Control Panel

              • Log in
              • Register