<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fashion statement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:15:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30780</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 12:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30780</guid>
		<description>When clothes were made by hand, they were very expensive.  Only the rich could afford more than a few sets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When clothes were made by hand, they were very expensive.  Only the rich could afford more than a few sets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 22:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30778</guid>
		<description>...can you see a Doctor...considered working class in the 1800&#039;s...wearing that crap?

Women came out of the fields, and thus had opportunity to gussy up. Just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;can you see a Doctor&#8230;considered working class in the 1800&#8242;s&#8230;wearing that crap?</p>
<p>Women came out of the fields, and thus had opportunity to gussy up. Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30775</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30775</guid>
		<description>And are those submariner dolphins and paratrooper badges?  Must be a SEAL, they are the only ones likely to earn both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And are those submariner dolphins and paratrooper badges?  Must be a SEAL, they are the only ones likely to earn both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30774</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30774</guid>
		<description>is that it was men who wore the colorful, outrageous clothes, the cut that showed off their physique.  They were the peacocks.  It was women who covered their bodies and dressed in bland colors.  Sometime in the 1600s, after the Protestant Reformation, the roles reversed...

http://www.bostoncostume.com/images/products/10194.jpg

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bostoncostume.com/images/products/10194.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that it was men who wore the colorful, outrageous clothes, the cut that showed off their physique.  They were the peacocks.  It was women who covered their bodies and dressed in bland colors.  Sometime in the 1600s, after the Protestant Reformation, the roles reversed&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bostoncostume.com/images/products/10194.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.bostoncostume.com/images/products/10194.jpg</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.bostoncostume.com/images/products/10194.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankC</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30771</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 19:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30771</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.uniforms-4u.com/productimages/5222/big-u-fully-customizable-us-navy-white-summer-uniform-15764.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;navy&quot; /&gt;

Makes me look good, damn good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.uniforms-4u.com/productimages/5222/big-u-fully-customizable-us-navy-white-summer-uniform-15764.jpg" alt="navy" /></p>
<p>Makes me look good, damn good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 18:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30767</guid>
		<description>I am the antithesis of any fashion statement. I drive my daughter nuts.

I am Good Will a hunting.

I played along for years. But my claustrophobia kicked in. I hate abhore detest restrictive clothing. I have not worn jeans or bras or heels for years. I cut my hair short because my waist length hair was strangling me. I couldn&#039;t wear it back because I got headaches. I wear yoga pants, a very thin white t-shirt and a man&#039;s oversize dress casual shirt over that so I won&#039;t get arrested for the tits a showing.

My daughter is a fashion icon. The minute she gets home from work, the bra is flung, the heels are replaced with slippers and sweatpants are the staple. See? This drives me nuts. I omit the middle man altogether. I go straight for the comfortable.

But I don&#039;t work outside the home for money, respect or benefits. I could have gotten away with my *style* as a hairstylist though. Actually any job I would gravitate to I could have gotten away with it.

Many companies demand fancy duds. 
Geared for the woman? You betcha. Because the roles are reversed for us. For example, brightly colored birds are the males....and they have to strut their stuff to make the female even consider them. Hooman males need the fancy cars and paycheck though to impress though. 
 A lot of women dress to impress other women. Jealously and one upping are the new *taupe*. It is a game.





I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the antithesis of any fashion statement. I drive my daughter nuts.</p>
<p>I am Good Will a hunting.</p>
<p>I played along for years. But my claustrophobia kicked in. I hate abhore detest restrictive clothing. I have not worn jeans or bras or heels for years. I cut my hair short because my waist length hair was strangling me. I couldn&#8217;t wear it back because I got headaches. I wear yoga pants, a very thin white t-shirt and a man&#8217;s oversize dress casual shirt over that so I won&#8217;t get arrested for the tits a showing.</p>
<p>My daughter is a fashion icon. The minute she gets home from work, the bra is flung, the heels are replaced with slippers and sweatpants are the staple. See? This drives me nuts. I omit the middle man altogether. I go straight for the comfortable.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t work outside the home for money, respect or benefits. I could have gotten away with my *style* as a hairstylist though. Actually any job I would gravitate to I could have gotten away with it.</p>
<p>Many companies demand fancy duds.<br />
Geared for the woman? You betcha. Because the roles are reversed for us. For example, brightly colored birds are the males&#8230;.and they have to strut their stuff to make the female even consider them. Hooman males need the fancy cars and paycheck though to impress though.<br />
 A lot of women dress to impress other women. Jealously and one upping are the new *taupe*. It is a game.</p>
<p>I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30764</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 17:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30764</guid>
		<description>or as my old friend O.D. used to put it, &quot;Duds make the dude&quot;.

Good points.  There has always been fashion of a sort, You read in historical accounts of hipsters dressing in &quot;the French style&quot;, or Italian fashion&quot;, and we can see costume changing throughout Europe in book illustrations and art.  Look at a collection of US currency, the dead Presidents morph from clean shaven with long hair (or wigs) to short hair and beards and mutton chops and burnsides, to the modern pansy short haircut  with no facial hair.  Who was the last president with a moustache? Teddy Roosevelt?  Who was the last one to run for President with a moustache? Thomas Dewey?  The three-cornered hat gave way to the stovepipe in one generation, which gave way to the snap-brim (now erroneously called the fedora).  Check out Jimmy Carter&#039;s presidential haircut, spinnaker neckties, flared trousers and wide-lapel suits. its right out of a disco!

Brit soldiers made fun of their American opponents by singing
&quot;[Yankee Doodle] put a feather in his hat and called it macaroni.&quot; They were hinting their country bumpkin enemies had no sense of style and fashion (&lt;em&gt;macaroni&lt;/em&gt;, in the slang of the time).

There was a tsunami of change in men&#039;s fashion around 1800, when the 18th century long hair, knee breeches, frock coat, and tricorn gave way to more modern-appearing garb.  Men gave up the colorful and flamboyant clothes they had traditionally worn and adopted drab colors and plain tailoring.  It was the death of the cavalier horseman and musketeer, all leather, codpieces, pantaloons and feathers, the male peacock in all his plumage, proudly displaying in silk above his pewter-buckled pumps a finely turned ankle and calf. Much of it was due to military fashion, Napoleon ordered his troops to cut their hair as a body louse hygiene measure, and it caught on.  Later, the Prussian Army stopped dressing their infantry in bright colors for battlefield identification and put them in field gray (smokeless powder rifles had replaced black powder muskets!) Around the turn of the 20th century, the man&#039;s suit pretty much stabilized into its present drab form, and post-WWI women&#039;s skirts shot up overnight above the knees. Clothing and style has been a folk art, albeit practiced most by those who could afford it.

But the establishment of a fashion industry, one pushing new lines and styles for every season of every new year, and one aimed primarily at women, is something new.  Any ideas how this came about?  And who decides why taupe is &quot;in&quot; for this summer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or as my old friend O.D. used to put it, &#8220;Duds make the dude&#8221;.</p>
<p>Good points.  There has always been fashion of a sort, You read in historical accounts of hipsters dressing in &#8220;the French style&#8221;, or Italian fashion&#8221;, and we can see costume changing throughout Europe in book illustrations and art.  Look at a collection of US currency, the dead Presidents morph from clean shaven with long hair (or wigs) to short hair and beards and mutton chops and burnsides, to the modern pansy short haircut  with no facial hair.  Who was the last president with a moustache? Teddy Roosevelt?  Who was the last one to run for President with a moustache? Thomas Dewey?  The three-cornered hat gave way to the stovepipe in one generation, which gave way to the snap-brim (now erroneously called the fedora).  Check out Jimmy Carter&#8217;s presidential haircut, spinnaker neckties, flared trousers and wide-lapel suits. its right out of a disco!</p>
<p>Brit soldiers made fun of their American opponents by singing<br />
&#8220;[Yankee Doodle] put a feather in his hat and called it macaroni.&#8221; They were hinting their country bumpkin enemies had no sense of style and fashion (<em>macaroni</em>, in the slang of the time).</p>
<p>There was a tsunami of change in men&#8217;s fashion around 1800, when the 18th century long hair, knee breeches, frock coat, and tricorn gave way to more modern-appearing garb.  Men gave up the colorful and flamboyant clothes they had traditionally worn and adopted drab colors and plain tailoring.  It was the death of the cavalier horseman and musketeer, all leather, codpieces, pantaloons and feathers, the male peacock in all his plumage, proudly displaying in silk above his pewter-buckled pumps a finely turned ankle and calf. Much of it was due to military fashion, Napoleon ordered his troops to cut their hair as a body louse hygiene measure, and it caught on.  Later, the Prussian Army stopped dressing their infantry in bright colors for battlefield identification and put them in field gray (smokeless powder rifles had replaced black powder muskets!) Around the turn of the 20th century, the man&#8217;s suit pretty much stabilized into its present drab form, and post-WWI women&#8217;s skirts shot up overnight above the knees. Clothing and style has been a folk art, albeit practiced most by those who could afford it.</p>
<p>But the establishment of a fashion industry, one pushing new lines and styles for every season of every new year, and one aimed primarily at women, is something new.  Any ideas how this came about?  And who decides why taupe is &#8220;in&#8221; for this summer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 16:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30763</guid>
		<description>...and moola...lots of moola. ...and we allow it.

The industry hones in our insecurities and convinces us a newer version of plumage will work better at attracting a mate....or make us feel better about ourselves. Clothes make the Man.

We are no better than any other animal. We are just so much more clever at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and moola&#8230;lots of moola. &#8230;and we allow it.</p>
<p>The industry hones in our insecurities and convinces us a newer version of plumage will work better at attracting a mate&#8230;.or make us feel better about ourselves. Clothes make the Man.</p>
<p>We are no better than any other animal. We are just so much more clever at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2014/05/24/fashion-statement/#comment-30762</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 04:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=45138#comment-30762</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;m embarrassed that I&#039;ve never thought to ask the question.  Like a lemming I&#039;ve just (mostly) gone along.

However, my favorite clothing, tan pants, Pendleton shirts, jeans, have not changed at all in years and years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m embarrassed that I&#8217;ve never thought to ask the question.  Like a lemming I&#8217;ve just (mostly) gone along.</p>
<p>However, my favorite clothing, tan pants, Pendleton shirts, jeans, have not changed at all in years and years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
