• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

The Orange Criminal POS abandons another ally BuckGalaxy May 7, 2025 10:18 am (CurrentEvents)

Orion spacecraft for crewed Artemis II lunar mission ready BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 8:13 pm (Space/Science)

Australia election more bad news conservatives BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 11:54 am (CurrentEvents)

Massive cuts to NASA budget proposed BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 9:19 am (Space/Science)

Say what? ER May 1, 2025 8:53 pm (CurrentEvents)

Radio Broadcasts BuckGalaxy May 1, 2025 12:28 pm (Space/Science)

The Last of Us BuckGalaxy April 30, 2025 12:37 pm (Science Fiction)

You can't make this stuff up... RobVG April 29, 2025 1:43 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's election day in Canada RobVG April 28, 2025 2:26 pm (CurrentEvents)

K2-18b BuckGalaxy April 21, 2025 12:07 pm (Space/Science)

Home » Space/Science

Back from Extinction . . . June 10, 2014 11:27 am DanS

Fact or Fiction?: Mammoths Can Be Brought Back from Extinction
Is de-extinction a real possibility?

6-10-14 | David Biello, Associate Editor

In a petri dish in the bowels of Harvard Medical School scientists have tweaked three genes from the cells of an Asian elephant that help control the production of hemoglobin, the protein in blood that carries oxygen. Their goal is to make these genes more like those of an animal that last walked the planet thousands of years ago: the woolly mammoth.

“Asian elephants are closer to mammoths than either is to African elephants, yet quite different in appearance and temperature range,” notes Harvard geneticist and technology developer George Church. “We are not trying to make an exact copy of a mammoth, but rather a cold-resistant elephant.”

But what if the new—and fast advancing—techniques of genome editing allowed scientists to engineer not only cold-resistance traits but also other characteristics of the woolly mammoth into its living Asiatic relatives? Scientists have found mammoth cells preserved in permafrost. If they were to recover cells with intact DNA, they could theoretically “edit” an Asian elephant’s genome to match the woolly mammoth’s. A single cell contains the complete genetic instruction set for its species, and by replicating that via editing a new individual can, theoretically, be created. But would such a hybrid—scion of an Asian elephant mother and genetic tinkerers—count as a true woolly mammoth?

A MAMMOTH ENDEAVOR, YES — but — should this be considered a brand new species, a recreation of an ancient species, or simply the reestablishment of a genetically dormant, previously extinct species…?

  • I am conflicted about this... by ER 2014-06-19 15:35:20
    • Gary and Pearl Heathe . . . by DanS 2014-06-20 06:18:51
      • I think you know the answer by mcfly 2014-06-20 06:15:13
      • Unfair to the animal involved by mcfly 2014-06-19 10:48:08
        • Trust me, these trials will continue . . . by DanS 2014-06-19 11:34:12
          • Corn is one thing... by mcfly 2014-06-19 13:51:02
            • Animals in general are not "self-aware" . . . by DanS 2014-06-20 03:40:37
              • How it's used is key. by bowser 2014-06-20 19:03:55
                • Pretty much all of that... by mcfly 2014-06-20 05:53:46
                  • Testing self-awareness in non-humans by mcfly 2014-06-20 06:31:39
                    • My dogs. by bowser 2014-06-20 19:07:29
                      • I (and more importantly, my dog) agree :-) by mcfly 2014-06-24 06:28:59
                      • Try it with an average dog . . . by DanS 2014-06-20 07:12:23
                        • Your presumptions are demonstrably wrong by mcfly 2014-06-20 08:27:48
                          • If true, who would be the better person . . . ? by DanS 2014-06-20 09:04:38
                            • That's some very nice gibberish there, Dan by mcfly 2014-06-20 09:18:25
                              • Animals in general are not "self-aware" . . . by DanS 2014-06-20 09:50:48
                                • Apparently humans are not self aware either at first by Jody 2014-06-20 17:22:38
                                  • Ruh roh...Podrock will be after me to keep it real by Jody 2014-06-20 17:25:29
                                    • Awareness in action! by podrock 2014-06-20 18:39:34
                                  • You're using assumption to replace the scientific method by mcfly 2014-06-20 11:11:45

              Search

              The Control Panel

              • Log in
              • Register