• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

"Make my day" BuckGalaxy June 5, 2025 1:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

NSIDC Data drop ER June 4, 2025 9:34 pm (Space/Science)

Boulder will be in your news soon. podrock June 1, 2025 3:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's over folks RL June 1, 2025 12:38 pm (Space/Science)

Administration solves things the old fashion way BuckGalaxy June 1, 2025 11:01 am (Flame)

Issacman out as NASA Admin BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 9:40 pm (Space/Science)

Lie, cheat and disable mechanisms... BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 8:04 pm (Space/Science)

Big beautiful wall RobVG May 31, 2025 11:50 am (Flame)

2025 Humans to the Moon & Mars Summit May 28 and 29 BuckGalaxy May 28, 2025 2:52 pm (Space/Science)

C'mon a little closer gonna do it to you BuckGalaxy May 27, 2025 9:46 pm (Off-Topic)

Watching SpaceX Starship flight 9, 7:30pm EST BuckGalaxy May 27, 2025 3:59 pm (Space/Science)

Same old song and dance BuckGalaxy May 26, 2025 10:02 pm (Flame)

Home » Off-Topic

Any speech majors out there? September 14, 2014 7:26 am ER

Do people talk differently in old movies?

I watch a lot of old flicks, and people definitely talk differently on them. I know slang, usage, and even some grammar has changed over time, and today’s vocabulary differs from the past’s. There have also been linguistic shifts in regional dialects, and class accents are constantly evolving, the sort of thing linguists study. But I’m talking about the rhythm and phrasing of everyday speech; the cadences of ordinary conversation. I definitely can detect differences, I just can’t quite put my finger on how to describe them.

Some of this may very well be due to different acting styles, the move from stage to screen, silents to talkies, and the shift to broadcasting. I’m sure the use of radio, and later, TV, influenced diction, too. All these media must have had varying technical requirements and standards for voice–to ensure accurate communication, dramatic effect or comic timing, particularly in the absence of gesture and other visual cues.

But I also think there is more to it than that. Listen to dialog in an old movie, dialog that is supposed to reproduce ordinary conversation, and it is clear nobody today would talk like that.

Today’s speech seems more curt, clipped, concise. It is more economical, and the timing seems changed, even though it may be clear and easily understood. There is definitely a difference in style. This is even the case among educated, professional speakers conversing in formal circumstances with cultured voices. Or am I making this all up? Keep in mind, the changes in vocalization I am hinting at here would not stand out in samples of written text.

I solicit your contributions.

  • What you seem to be seeking. by bowser 2014-09-15 17:26:10
    • You're mostly right, but I disagree about the Shakespeare by ER 2014-09-16 06:56:04
    • True Grit . . . by DanS 2014-09-15 11:34:10
      • Its nice when moviemakers take the trouble to do that. by ER 2014-09-15 12:50:31
      • An aside, maybe relevant. by bowser 2014-09-14 11:19:52
        • Not quite what I was getting at. by ER 2014-09-14 12:06:58
        • Microphones by Robert 2014-09-14 11:12:37
          • The same comments as to Bowser above. by ER 2014-09-14 12:32:45
            • I wasn't disagreeing with you by Robert 2014-09-14 22:27:06
              • Steady Devolution by ER 2014-09-15 04:57:06

          Search

          The Control Panel

          • Log in
          • Register