• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Season 3 - Foundation BuckGalaxy August 2, 2025 12:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Shoot the messenger BuckGalaxy August 1, 2025 2:00 pm (CurrentEvents)

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Why Trump Can’t Shake Jeffrey Epstein BuckGalaxy July 18, 2025 8:07 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » Off-Topic

Second thoughts on "well regulated militia". October 11, 2014 6:23 pm bowser

I’ve come to understand the gun nuts position on the Second Amendment a bit better, and they have a pretty good case for their beliefs.  This has come about as the result of my tendency to try to understand that which is not.

I researched what a “militia” was at the time the Constitution was written.  I had assumed it was sort of like the National Guard on a city or county level.  People were enrolled, trained, and belonged.  They were not particularly well equipped, and certainly not outfitted by the State, County, City or Village but by themselves.  I was wrong.

Militias were ad hoc military units composed of civilians with guns who answered a call to arms.  They supplied their own arms and just showed up when requested.  Or they didn’t.

Therefore, it was in the interest of the rebellion that there be an armed segment of the population which was available to participate in battles alongside the Regular forces.  (That they were unreliable and tended to run away at the first volley was used to advantage on occasion.)

So, I will admit the Constitution intended for the population to be armed.  What “well-regulated” means and how it applies is a different issue, and if included in the debate would probably limit who possesses which arms.

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register