11-4-2014 | Joshua A. Krisch

The Republican Party is widely predicted to win control of the Senate as a result of today’s midterm elections. In broadstrokes, that outcome portends a green light for the Keystone XL Pipeline, a blow to the Affordable Care Act and a push for corporate tax reform.

But what would a GOP-controlled Senate mean for scientists and their research?

When it comes to science (and, more importantly, funding) individual senators are perhaps less important than the committees that they run. There are 20 committees in the U.S. Senate, with responsibilities ranging from homeland security to urban development. The chairperson of each committee, appointed by the majority party, holds inordinate sway over how his or her committee votes.

If Republicans take control of the Senate, we can expect a major shakeup within the ranks of these powerful committees. But, despite the conventional wisdom, conservatives aren’t always bad for science. Here are three of the senate committees that hold the most sway over science and scientific research—and what might happen to them if Republicans win the day.

More.

Green is an increase. Red a decrease. Intensity of color indicates degree.

The N.I.H. is the small gray circle under Health and Human Services. Gray means there’s no increase or decrease. This is Obama’s proposed budget for 2013, not Congress’s.

Click on the other tabs too, like the one that splits it into mandatory and discretionary spending.

This chart is similar, although less detailed, but it includes history. Click on a square to see what spending in a category has done over time.

And that’s where the money goes.

(Sorry I don’t have anything more recent than 2013.)