• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Afrikaan- American news ER August 5, 2025 8:01 am (CurrentEvents)

Season 3 - Foundation BuckGalaxy August 2, 2025 12:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Shoot the messenger BuckGalaxy August 1, 2025 2:00 pm (CurrentEvents)

AI and the superconducting relativistic monkey collider RL July 26, 2025 10:14 pm (Off-Topic)

Trump's namecalling is no match for the Scots BuckGalaxy July 26, 2025 2:15 pm (Flame)

Retirement home Spirit cover -- yeah, we had better music. ER July 26, 2025 7:31 am (Off-Topic)

Maxwell's Silver Hammer ER July 26, 2025 6:58 am (CurrentEvents)

♫ I tell you to enjoy life I wish I could but it's too late ♫ BuckGalaxy July 22, 2025 1:32 pm (Off-Topic)

How Groupthink Protected Biden and Re-elected Trump, or put another way... BuckGalaxy July 19, 2025 2:32 pm (Flame)

Home » Flame

"Those who can afford it the least." October 30, 2014 9:31 am bowser

I’m very suspicious of the current political ads which urge a vote one way or the other to protect “those who can afford it the least”.  This concern for the poor as expressed in a barrage of ads paid for by the larger corporations ring hollow to me.  Right now it’s about labeling genetically modified foods.  All a once, “those who can afford it the least” will bear a tremendous burden if that is enacted.

In my State, “those who can afford it the least” are stomped on regularly in the taxes, fees, and practices such as legalized gambling which impact them directly.  No one cares.  And watch out of large corporations all at once seem to have an interest in protecting them.

  • Corporations are not people, my friend. by hank 2014-10-30 10:34:05
    • I probably wasn't clear. by bowser 2014-11-02 16:38:32
      • Cost/benefit analysis. by hank 2014-11-02 19:29:00

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register