<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things change slowly, incrementally.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:18:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34826</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34826</guid>
		<description>In fact, that was the best part of the era.  My mother used to tell me the big fear of the GIs coming back from the war was that the country would immediately slide back into Depression.  The fact we didn&#039;t was an accomplishment the Truman administration was never given proper credit for.

It was just a soul-crushing time to be living in, a time of conformity and blandness.  I was just a kid, and I could feel it, but of course, I was just a kid, (I was born in Aug of 1947) and I wasn&#039;t a proper judge of Life or History. 
But there was the space program, and civil rights, and we had a handsome, intelligent new President with a pretty young wife.  When the 60s finally rolled around things really started loosening up, the world was changing for the better.  We were going to explore the solar system and we were going to kick Commie ass on the way there. We eventually did both, but it wasn&#039;t quite how we expected it. 1960 was like a breath of fresh air, the future was finally here.  There was optimism everywhere--until the day Kennedy was shot.  That was the day everything changed. And then there was Viet Nam.  The Beatles came just in time, but they weren&#039;t enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, that was the best part of the era.  My mother used to tell me the big fear of the GIs coming back from the war was that the country would immediately slide back into Depression.  The fact we didn&#8217;t was an accomplishment the Truman administration was never given proper credit for.</p>
<p>It was just a soul-crushing time to be living in, a time of conformity and blandness.  I was just a kid, and I could feel it, but of course, I was just a kid, (I was born in Aug of 1947) and I wasn&#8217;t a proper judge of Life or History.<br />
But there was the space program, and civil rights, and we had a handsome, intelligent new President with a pretty young wife.  When the 60s finally rolled around things really started loosening up, the world was changing for the better.  We were going to explore the solar system and we were going to kick Commie ass on the way there. We eventually did both, but it wasn&#8217;t quite how we expected it. 1960 was like a breath of fresh air, the future was finally here.  There was optimism everywhere&#8211;until the day Kennedy was shot.  That was the day everything changed. And then there was Viet Nam.  The Beatles came just in time, but they weren&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowser</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34818</link>
		<dc:creator>bowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34818</guid>
		<description>Things weren&#039;t great for everyone, you are right.  Injustice and privation existed, folks suffered.  And, in addition, things were better for more people than ever before.

Not only that, but economic prosperity set the stage for the &#039;60s leaps forward toward economic security and social equality.

It doesn&#039;t have to be Utopia for all in order to be better for most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things weren&#8217;t great for everyone, you are right.  Injustice and privation existed, folks suffered.  And, in addition, things were better for more people than ever before.</p>
<p>Not only that, but economic prosperity set the stage for the &#8217;60s leaps forward toward economic security and social equality.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have to be Utopia for all in order to be better for most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankC</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34805</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 22:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34805</guid>
		<description>I never read the credits and did not recognize him. Maybe that will save him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never read the credits and did not recognize him. Maybe that will save him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34781</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34781</guid>
		<description>But at least one thing is still the same,

There is a malaise in the air, and psychiatric pseudoscience, fundamentalist religion, and reactionary politics still flourish.

You&#039;re right, That SyFy series was dreadful.  Not only was the story depressing, and filled with plot holes that were never really explained, but you never really figured out what the aliens were all about.

And it was so sad watching fine, veteran UK actor Charles Dance (Lord Lannister on Game of Thrones)dressed up in that preposterous Satan suit. I hope he got enough money for that role to retire on, because I doubt he&#039;ll ever be able to get another dramatic part for the rest of his life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But at least one thing is still the same,</p>
<p>There is a malaise in the air, and psychiatric pseudoscience, fundamentalist religion, and reactionary politics still flourish.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, That SyFy series was dreadful.  Not only was the story depressing, and filled with plot holes that were never really explained, but you never really figured out what the aliens were all about.</p>
<p>And it was so sad watching fine, veteran UK actor Charles Dance (Lord Lannister on Game of Thrones)dressed up in that preposterous Satan suit. I hope he got enough money for that role to retire on, because I doubt he&#8217;ll ever be able to get another dramatic part for the rest of his life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankC</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34778</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34778</guid>
		<description>Dang, ER that is about as depressing as the recent mini-series of the same name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, ER that is about as depressing as the recent mini-series of the same name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2015/12/13/things-change-slowly-incrementally/#comment-34635</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=53727#comment-34635</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;From my autobiography  -- These lines were written early in 2001.&lt;/strong&gt;

  
As I write these lines, I am aware of a nostalgia in my time about the decade of the &#039;50s.  I don&#039;t share it, even though I spent those years as a loved and sheltered child and was spared the bulk of its outrages.  But make no mistake, it was not a good time.  For the generation starting families after the horror of the war and the despair of the Great Depression, it must have seemed a paradise:  the economy was booming as an undamaged and relatively untouched  America and its awesome industry and limitless resources expanded into the desolation that was the rest of the world.  But beneath the flood of appliances, cars and suburban houses there was no soul.  The country was provincial, cruel to those who did not share in the new affluence and still riddled with the same injustices it had dragged into the new century from the previous one.  America, for all its bounty, has always promised more than it could deliver.  Of course, there was some progress, unions had turned the workplace into something somewhat less oppressive than it had been in the past, higher education started to filter down to the masses, and social legislation was providing some cushion for the lowest levels of society.  The social price we would pay for television, tract housing, and the automobile was still not obvious; and neither was the tremendous cost to our natural resources this brave new affluence was to impose on our future.  As long as things were getting better no one seemed to notice that they still were not very different.  A new enemy, the Communists, replaced fascism, and America responded with a kinder, gentler fascism of its own.  Unlike some of my liberal friends, I believe the Reds [Communists] were a genuine menace and a response to them had to be mounted, but the fifties were a time of myopia, simple solutions, and black and white morality.  Blacks were still oppressed, women were still second-class citizens, and a prudish Victorian sexual pathology emerged to throttle the coming puberty of the baby boom generation.  Perhaps the most troubling problem was a failure on the part of society as a whole to admit there was a problem.  There was a malaise in the air, psychiatric pseudoscience, fundamentalist religion, and reactionary politics flourished.  The Cold War and the shadow of the Bomb touched everything, but I doubt that fear of nuclear annihilation ever had the grip on the population that modern historians perceive.  What did have America in a stranglehold was a crushing conservatism (not necessarily political) coupled with a morbid fear of being different.  It seemed that with affluence came conformity.  It was a time when growing your hair long was considered perverted and all popular culture, music and entertainment, seemed hopelessly banal.  The arts, which usually rescue us from times like these, turned inward, confusing incomprehensibility and lack of discipline with profundity and innovation.  Even those few who sounded the alarm were either dismissed as fools or attacked as subversives; who remembers the Beats today?  The generation of heroes who survived the depression and won the war turned petty and mean in their middle age and a cheerfully drab commercialism smothered the land.  It was something new in America:  the corporate welfare state.

This was the time when I began to physically mature with the usual teenage complaints of acne and rebellion,  the brutal testosterone tyranny that grips half the human race as our emerging evolutionary imperative to reproduce collides with civilization&#039;s multiple layers of regulation and control.  I have come to see that the rush to the suburbs, so desired by my parent&#039;s generation in order to prepare a suitable place to raise children, became the ultimate source of many of the social problems that plague us today.  City kids are tough and street-wise, and are forced to learn to deal with the urban landscape and with each other in order to survive.  Country kids are brought up in a wholesome environment of hard work, traditional values, family and community.  But the children of the suburbs live in the worst of both worlds, a sterile and barren wasteland which is stultifying and  uniform both internally and in comparison with other suburbs.  It is an environment with little to offer children or adolescents in the way of stimulation or education.  The major form of socialization is television, which has its own commercial agenda far removed from the enlightenment and challenge of youth. The only escape from this planet of loneliness is the automobile, since no other form of suitable transport is available.  Waiting to get old enough to acquire a driver&#039;s license is how most of my generation remembers the interminable years between puberty and the loss of virginity.  Rather than interacting with an extended family and with a variety of acquaintances of various ages as I had in the city, the suburban youth lives in a world with only two types of inhabitants:  parents and other teenage wretches in the same boat.  That the two tribes should come into conflict and adolescence extend to late in life is inevitable.  The postwar demographic phenomenon of the baby boom only aggravated the situation by  creating a large cohort of children of similar age who grew up together in the same drab universe. 

The creation of suburban culture replaced the extended family with the nuclear family, and community died with it.  This is a unique social phenomenon, even the immigrants who came to America in the nineteenth and early twentieth century had their ghettos, and the virtues of close-knit city neighborhoods and small towns are pretty universally recognized.  Without family and community a new form of social organization has arisen, where most of our friends and acquaintances do not know each other; the automobile and the telephone are the only way we have of interacting with them and they are strangers to one another.  Only the workplace and the school offer any sort of community, and these are institutionalized and artificially homogeneous environments.  Our parents were raised in another time and were already socialized under more conventional conditions, so they were immune to the negative effects.  The collapse in social institutions that most of us more or less accept as a fact of modern life, has nothing to do with the breakdown of morality or the banning of school prayer or any of the other straw men that our conservative commentators are always whining about.  The problem is that capitalism worked too well for our own good.

But the smell of change was in the air by 1960, it was my first new decade, and although a purely arbitrary milestone, there was a psychological barrier lifted when the old decade ended.  I had a vague understanding of the social forces I alluded to in the previous paragraphs, but I dismissed my misgivings about where the country was headed as simple growing pains:  we were going to the planets, perhaps in my lifetime, and no problem could long survive the assault of reason and science.  Practical barriers were lifting for my family, too.  Vicente and my mother parted, and we moved to our first house (not a rental!).  My mother got the job she had waited a lifetime for, an executive secretary for a large phosphate mining company near Tampa and we could now afford to buy a home in a vast new housing development on the outskirts of town.  By today&#039;s standards the little mass-produced houses all crowded together in a former cow pasture might seem little better than just another version of the government projects, but for us, we had arrived.  People today don&#039;t seem to realize just how rare home ownership was until fairly recently.  Again, it was the legacy of the New Deal;  Herminia used my father&#039;s Veteran&#039;s benefits to swing the loan.  We had a small, but brand new, house on it&#039;s own quarter acre and for the period of a twenty year loan only one week&#039;s paycheck every month went to the mortgage.  For the first time, we owned a shiny new car, a cheap model, but it smelled great.  Even health insurance, at six dollars a month with the Cuban Clinic, was within our reach.  Please forgive my sarcasm, but I&#039;m not too impressed by the benefits of our present day turn-of-the-century affluence.  I simply can&#039;t imagine a widow with children doing this today on a secretary&#039;s salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From my autobiography  &#8212; These lines were written early in 2001.</strong></p>
<p>As I write these lines, I am aware of a nostalgia in my time about the decade of the &#8217;50s.  I don&#8217;t share it, even though I spent those years as a loved and sheltered child and was spared the bulk of its outrages.  But make no mistake, it was not a good time.  For the generation starting families after the horror of the war and the despair of the Great Depression, it must have seemed a paradise:  the economy was booming as an undamaged and relatively untouched  America and its awesome industry and limitless resources expanded into the desolation that was the rest of the world.  But beneath the flood of appliances, cars and suburban houses there was no soul.  The country was provincial, cruel to those who did not share in the new affluence and still riddled with the same injustices it had dragged into the new century from the previous one.  America, for all its bounty, has always promised more than it could deliver.  Of course, there was some progress, unions had turned the workplace into something somewhat less oppressive than it had been in the past, higher education started to filter down to the masses, and social legislation was providing some cushion for the lowest levels of society.  The social price we would pay for television, tract housing, and the automobile was still not obvious; and neither was the tremendous cost to our natural resources this brave new affluence was to impose on our future.  As long as things were getting better no one seemed to notice that they still were not very different.  A new enemy, the Communists, replaced fascism, and America responded with a kinder, gentler fascism of its own.  Unlike some of my liberal friends, I believe the Reds [Communists] were a genuine menace and a response to them had to be mounted, but the fifties were a time of myopia, simple solutions, and black and white morality.  Blacks were still oppressed, women were still second-class citizens, and a prudish Victorian sexual pathology emerged to throttle the coming puberty of the baby boom generation.  Perhaps the most troubling problem was a failure on the part of society as a whole to admit there was a problem.  There was a malaise in the air, psychiatric pseudoscience, fundamentalist religion, and reactionary politics flourished.  The Cold War and the shadow of the Bomb touched everything, but I doubt that fear of nuclear annihilation ever had the grip on the population that modern historians perceive.  What did have America in a stranglehold was a crushing conservatism (not necessarily political) coupled with a morbid fear of being different.  It seemed that with affluence came conformity.  It was a time when growing your hair long was considered perverted and all popular culture, music and entertainment, seemed hopelessly banal.  The arts, which usually rescue us from times like these, turned inward, confusing incomprehensibility and lack of discipline with profundity and innovation.  Even those few who sounded the alarm were either dismissed as fools or attacked as subversives; who remembers the Beats today?  The generation of heroes who survived the depression and won the war turned petty and mean in their middle age and a cheerfully drab commercialism smothered the land.  It was something new in America:  the corporate welfare state.</p>
<p>This was the time when I began to physically mature with the usual teenage complaints of acne and rebellion,  the brutal testosterone tyranny that grips half the human race as our emerging evolutionary imperative to reproduce collides with civilization&#8217;s multiple layers of regulation and control.  I have come to see that the rush to the suburbs, so desired by my parent&#8217;s generation in order to prepare a suitable place to raise children, became the ultimate source of many of the social problems that plague us today.  City kids are tough and street-wise, and are forced to learn to deal with the urban landscape and with each other in order to survive.  Country kids are brought up in a wholesome environment of hard work, traditional values, family and community.  But the children of the suburbs live in the worst of both worlds, a sterile and barren wasteland which is stultifying and  uniform both internally and in comparison with other suburbs.  It is an environment with little to offer children or adolescents in the way of stimulation or education.  The major form of socialization is television, which has its own commercial agenda far removed from the enlightenment and challenge of youth. The only escape from this planet of loneliness is the automobile, since no other form of suitable transport is available.  Waiting to get old enough to acquire a driver&#8217;s license is how most of my generation remembers the interminable years between puberty and the loss of virginity.  Rather than interacting with an extended family and with a variety of acquaintances of various ages as I had in the city, the suburban youth lives in a world with only two types of inhabitants:  parents and other teenage wretches in the same boat.  That the two tribes should come into conflict and adolescence extend to late in life is inevitable.  The postwar demographic phenomenon of the baby boom only aggravated the situation by  creating a large cohort of children of similar age who grew up together in the same drab universe. </p>
<p>The creation of suburban culture replaced the extended family with the nuclear family, and community died with it.  This is a unique social phenomenon, even the immigrants who came to America in the nineteenth and early twentieth century had their ghettos, and the virtues of close-knit city neighborhoods and small towns are pretty universally recognized.  Without family and community a new form of social organization has arisen, where most of our friends and acquaintances do not know each other; the automobile and the telephone are the only way we have of interacting with them and they are strangers to one another.  Only the workplace and the school offer any sort of community, and these are institutionalized and artificially homogeneous environments.  Our parents were raised in another time and were already socialized under more conventional conditions, so they were immune to the negative effects.  The collapse in social institutions that most of us more or less accept as a fact of modern life, has nothing to do with the breakdown of morality or the banning of school prayer or any of the other straw men that our conservative commentators are always whining about.  The problem is that capitalism worked too well for our own good.</p>
<p>But the smell of change was in the air by 1960, it was my first new decade, and although a purely arbitrary milestone, there was a psychological barrier lifted when the old decade ended.  I had a vague understanding of the social forces I alluded to in the previous paragraphs, but I dismissed my misgivings about where the country was headed as simple growing pains:  we were going to the planets, perhaps in my lifetime, and no problem could long survive the assault of reason and science.  Practical barriers were lifting for my family, too.  Vicente and my mother parted, and we moved to our first house (not a rental!).  My mother got the job she had waited a lifetime for, an executive secretary for a large phosphate mining company near Tampa and we could now afford to buy a home in a vast new housing development on the outskirts of town.  By today&#8217;s standards the little mass-produced houses all crowded together in a former cow pasture might seem little better than just another version of the government projects, but for us, we had arrived.  People today don&#8217;t seem to realize just how rare home ownership was until fairly recently.  Again, it was the legacy of the New Deal;  Herminia used my father&#8217;s Veteran&#8217;s benefits to swing the loan.  We had a small, but brand new, house on it&#8217;s own quarter acre and for the period of a twenty year loan only one week&#8217;s paycheck every month went to the mortgage.  For the first time, we owned a shiny new car, a cheap model, but it smelled great.  Even health insurance, at six dollars a month with the Cuban Clinic, was within our reach.  Please forgive my sarcasm, but I&#8217;m not too impressed by the benefits of our present day turn-of-the-century affluence.  I simply can&#8217;t imagine a widow with children doing this today on a secretary&#8217;s salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
