<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podrock: Pareidolia, or Possibly Petrified Protozoans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2016/02/08/podrock-pareidolia-or-possibly-petrified-protozoans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2016/02/08/podrock-pareidolia-or-possibly-petrified-protozoans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:20:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: podrock</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2016/02/08/podrock-pareidolia-or-possibly-petrified-protozoans/#comment-35542</link>
		<dc:creator>podrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=55607#comment-35542</guid>
		<description>Every hydrothermal deposit on earth, for pretty much the last 3 billion years, has life as part of the environment. Therefore, every earth analog is contaminated by life. We do not have a example that we can assume is life-free.

Mars is the other way &#039;round. Since there is, to date, no evidence for life there, it makes sense to start with the model of non-biologic processes to develop the features we see on mars.

Maybe this will help us separate organic forms from inorganic ones.

This morphology of sinter as evidence of life? Unconvincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every hydrothermal deposit on earth, for pretty much the last 3 billion years, has life as part of the environment. Therefore, every earth analog is contaminated by life. We do not have a example that we can assume is life-free.</p>
<p>Mars is the other way &#8217;round. Since there is, to date, no evidence for life there, it makes sense to start with the model of non-biologic processes to develop the features we see on mars.</p>
<p>Maybe this will help us separate organic forms from inorganic ones.</p>
<p>This morphology of sinter as evidence of life? Unconvincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
