• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

The destruction of Goddard is illegal RL October 31, 2025 9:41 am (Space/Science)

Weighing the scales on Elon Musk BuckGalaxy October 30, 2025 9:28 pm (Flame)

Bunker Envy ? podrock October 30, 2025 6:18 pm (CurrentEvents)

Message in a bottle BuckGalaxy October 29, 2025 10:55 am (Off-Topic)

According to some, we're a nation of illiterate dependents looking for a handout RobVG October 27, 2025 8:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

The 1% RobVG October 27, 2025 10:54 am (Off-Topic)

Parting Shot ER October 27, 2025 4:36 am (Off-Topic)

Space X put on notice RobVG October 20, 2025 4:55 pm (Space/Science)

There is no bottom to this barrel... RL October 19, 2025 5:40 pm (CurrentEvents)

John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 16, 2025 10:00 pm (Space/Science)

Brosz baffled, Bondi busts Bolton ER October 16, 2025 2:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » CurrentEvents

McConnell, the nuclear option, and lowering the bar in America April 3, 2017 5:30 pm mcfly

My guess is that the mourning period for the senate filibuster will be shorter than an episode of your favorite sit-com. But personally, that’s not what bothers me about this.

Making it easier for a Supreme Court nominee to sail through the confirmation process is, imo, a really bad thing for America. A process that’s difficult encourages the nomination of outstanding candidates, simply because the lesser-qualified are much more likely to fail. It also encourages vigorous, passionate debate, as even an outstanding candidate will be heavily scrutinized and will need to do extremely well in order to be confirmed. This is, it seems to me, exactly the process we want.

Lowering the bar from 60 to 51 senate votes will put us in a place where mediocrity may often be entirely sufficient to obtain confirmation, and where debate over a candidate may often be shorter and less meaningful than it is now. A willingness to toe the party line may become more important than a judicial record.

This too will be part of Trump’s legacy–a Supreme Court to which it’s much easier to ascend. Why shoot for excellence when in Trump’s America, “good enough” is good enough? It’s yet another sign that Trump is quite undisturbed by the fact that he’s putting America in free-fall.

  • Actually, I'm all in favor of "Majority plus one" takes all. by hank 2017-04-03 18:15:17
    • "It's all on the Democrats," says Mitch McConnell, pilot of the Enola Gay by mcfly 2017-04-03 19:16:19

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register