• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Clearly threatening language BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 3:43 pm (Flame)

Most common planet type in the Galaxy BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:51 pm (Space/Science)

Large Loathsome Legislation fails in committee BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

Large Hadron Collider Eureka! BuckGalaxy May 15, 2025 11:44 am (Space/Science)

Plan(et) 9 from Outer Space BuckGalaxy May 13, 2025 10:58 am (Space/Science)

Shouldn't there be an Afrikaaner-American studies department in our universities? ER May 12, 2025 2:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

The Orange Criminal POS abandons another ally BuckGalaxy May 7, 2025 10:18 am (CurrentEvents)

Orion spacecraft for crewed Artemis II lunar mission ready BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 8:13 pm (Space/Science)

Australia election more bad news conservatives BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 11:54 am (CurrentEvents)

Massive cuts to NASA budget proposed BuckGalaxy May 3, 2025 9:19 am (Space/Science)

Say what? ER May 1, 2025 8:53 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » CurrentEvents

McConnell, the nuclear option, and lowering the bar in America April 3, 2017 5:30 pm mcfly

My guess is that the mourning period for the senate filibuster will be shorter than an episode of your favorite sit-com. But personally, that’s not what bothers me about this.

Making it easier for a Supreme Court nominee to sail through the confirmation process is, imo, a really bad thing for America. A process that’s difficult encourages the nomination of outstanding candidates, simply because the lesser-qualified are much more likely to fail. It also encourages vigorous, passionate debate, as even an outstanding candidate will be heavily scrutinized and will need to do extremely well in order to be confirmed. This is, it seems to me, exactly the process we want.

Lowering the bar from 60 to 51 senate votes will put us in a place where mediocrity may often be entirely sufficient to obtain confirmation, and where debate over a candidate may often be shorter and less meaningful than it is now. A willingness to toe the party line may become more important than a judicial record.

This too will be part of Trump’s legacy–a Supreme Court to which it’s much easier to ascend. Why shoot for excellence when in Trump’s America, “good enough” is good enough? It’s yet another sign that Trump is quite undisturbed by the fact that he’s putting America in free-fall.

  • Actually, I'm all in favor of "Majority plus one" takes all. by hank 2017-04-03 18:15:17
    • "It's all on the Democrats," says Mitch McConnell, pilot of the Enola Gay by mcfly 2017-04-03 19:16:19

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register