<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yo, RL&#8211;your photobucket links are not working.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2017/07/20/yo-rl-your-photobucket-links-are-not-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2017/07/20/yo-rl-your-photobucket-links-are-not-working/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 09:05:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2017/07/20/yo-rl-your-photobucket-links-are-not-working/#comment-39759</link>
		<dc:creator>RL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=65724#comment-39759</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, those motherfuckers... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csoonline.com/article/3205765/internet/photobucket-replaced-millions-of-images-with-ransom-demand.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;after years of using them they have decided that they want me to pay them a $399.99  a year fee to link images&lt;/a&gt;...

I think not...

I may rig up an automated script to upload a High res image of &quot;FUCK YOU PHOTOBUCKET&quot; over and over until it fills up my allotted storage and the abandon the account... 



&lt;blockquote&gt;On June 26, the Photobucket blog briefly noted its updated Terms of Service, which went into effect on June 20. In the three-sentence post, there is no mention of the end of hotlinking unless users pay a $399 annual fee. After clicking to view the new terms, there is a list of three paid account plans, but only the $400 Plus 500 Plan allows for third-party image hosting.

Loyal Photobucket users are furious; many describing the move with terms such as ransom and extortion.

Anyone else surprised #photobucket isn&#039;t offering Bitcoin as the only method of payment?

&#8212; McMike (@_McMike_) June 29, 2017
Instead of paying the ransom annual fee, many Photobucket users are turning to other sites that still allow hotlinking.

Stampboards pointed out that users “have no guarantee [Photobucket] will still be in business even in a month the way this disaster is rolling out.” Instead of paying to remove the “’WannaCry’ Gangster like $US400 cash Demand dial,” the forum announcement suggested, “someone at Photobucket with a brain will see the disaster they have unleashed, and back off totally, or in large part in the next week.”

A few other users have come up with workarounds, such as a Chrome extension that is supposed to show the actual embedded image instead of the error message and a fix that is supposed to convert blocked Photobucket images into a working URL.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, those motherfuckers&#8230; <a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/3205765/internet/photobucket-replaced-millions-of-images-with-ransom-demand.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">after years of using them they have decided that they want me to pay them a $399.99  a year fee to link images</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>I think not&#8230;</p>
<p>I may rig up an automated script to upload a High res image of &#8220;FUCK YOU PHOTOBUCKET&#8221; over and over until it fills up my allotted storage and the abandon the account&#8230; </p>
<blockquote><p>On June 26, the Photobucket blog briefly noted its updated Terms of Service, which went into effect on June 20. In the three-sentence post, there is no mention of the end of hotlinking unless users pay a $399 annual fee. After clicking to view the new terms, there is a list of three paid account plans, but only the $400 Plus 500 Plan allows for third-party image hosting.</p>
<p>Loyal Photobucket users are furious; many describing the move with terms such as ransom and extortion.</p>
<p>Anyone else surprised #photobucket isn&#8217;t offering Bitcoin as the only method of payment?</p>
<p>&mdash; McMike (@_McMike_) June 29, 2017<br />
Instead of paying the ransom annual fee, many Photobucket users are turning to other sites that still allow hotlinking.</p>
<p>Stampboards pointed out that users “have no guarantee [Photobucket] will still be in business even in a month the way this disaster is rolling out.” Instead of paying to remove the “’WannaCry’ Gangster like $US400 cash Demand dial,” the forum announcement suggested, “someone at Photobucket with a brain will see the disaster they have unleashed, and back off totally, or in large part in the next week.”</p>
<p>A few other users have come up with workarounds, such as a Chrome extension that is supposed to show the actual embedded image instead of the error message and a fix that is supposed to convert blocked Photobucket images into a working URL.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
