<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edited to run in the time allotted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://habitablezone.com/2018/09/28/edited-to-run-in-the-time-allotted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://habitablezone.com/2018/09/28/edited-to-run-in-the-time-allotted/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 20:57:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://habitablezone.com/2018/09/28/edited-to-run-in-the-time-allotted/#comment-42179</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.habitablezone.com/?p=73455#comment-42179</guid>
		<description>I hear ya, man. Escaping the butchery is a one of the key attractions of the streaming services.

Personally, even on a streaming service, if I see the runtime of a TV episode is precisely 43 minutes +/- 10 seconds, I know that it prioritizes advertising space over quality, and I&#039;m more inclined to ignore these broadcast retreads. It&#039;s also a bit dispiriting to compare the modern runtime to that of shows produced back in the &#039;60s: Typically nearer to 50 minutes, sometimes more.

OTOH, it&#039;s a delight to see the runtime varying wildly on a made-for-streaming series, because you know that the producers were given the freedom to just do a good job. 

With movies, you&#039;re almost guaranteed to see the unexpurgated original on streaming. But even than you have to take note of which &quot;edition&quot; of the movie they&#039;re showing, and look for code words like &quot;theatrical&quot; or &quot;director&#039;s cut&quot;. And on the streaming music services, nothing disgusts me more than seeing the word &quot;(clean)&quot; appended to the title of a song--&quot;clean&quot; is a chickenshit euphemism for &quot;censored&quot;.

BTW, &quot;The Man in the High Castle&quot; is coming back next month for its third season. I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya, man. Escaping the butchery is a one of the key attractions of the streaming services.</p>
<p>Personally, even on a streaming service, if I see the runtime of a TV episode is precisely 43 minutes +/- 10 seconds, I know that it prioritizes advertising space over quality, and I&#8217;m more inclined to ignore these broadcast retreads. It&#8217;s also a bit dispiriting to compare the modern runtime to that of shows produced back in the &#8217;60s: Typically nearer to 50 minutes, sometimes more.</p>
<p>OTOH, it&#8217;s a delight to see the runtime varying wildly on a made-for-streaming series, because you know that the producers were given the freedom to just do a good job. </p>
<p>With movies, you&#8217;re almost guaranteed to see the unexpurgated original on streaming. But even than you have to take note of which &#8220;edition&#8221; of the movie they&#8217;re showing, and look for code words like &#8220;theatrical&#8221; or &#8220;director&#8217;s cut&#8221;. And on the streaming music services, nothing disgusts me more than seeing the word &#8220;(clean)&#8221; appended to the title of a song&#8211;&#8221;clean&#8221; is a chickenshit euphemism for &#8220;censored&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;The Man in the High Castle&#8221; is coming back next month for its third season. I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
