• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Blue Origin halts New Shepard flights BuckGalaxy January 31, 2026 3:13 am (Space/Science)

Trouble on the way BuckGalaxy January 28, 2026 1:47 pm (CurrentEvents)

Being a tech bro gets you a commission and a uniform podrock January 28, 2026 11:16 am (CurrentEvents)

Artificial Intelligence ER January 28, 2026 6:56 am (Flame)

Emily Blunt's favorite sandwich. ER January 27, 2026 7:46 am (Comestible Zone)

hey hey SDG January 26, 2026 10:38 pm (6)

‘Yes, it’s going to crack’ - a spacecraft not everyone thinks is safe to fly BuckGalaxy January 23, 2026 10:42 am (Flame)

Trump’s Greenland Gambit Has Broken Brains Across Washington BuckGalaxy January 21, 2026 8:38 pm (Flame)

This is so strange, on so many levels. ER January 21, 2026 5:13 pm (Off-Topic)

What's in your wallet? ER January 19, 2026 8:10 pm (CurrentEvents)

Anne Applebaum: Trump’s Letter to Norway Should Be the Last Straw BuckGalaxy January 19, 2026 7:18 pm (Flame)

Sloppy Seconds BuckGalaxy January 16, 2026 7:24 pm (Flame)

Home » Off-Topic

TOTALLY, absolutely off-topic June 21, 2020 10:49 am hank

I just watched a modern production of the old Broadway show “42nd Street”. It brought up a question that I have asked myself many times before…

Why do girl’s legs look better today than they did in the 1930s and 40s?

I’ve seen a million of those old “show” movies from the Busby Berkely era, and I’m sure that in those days (just as today) the dancers were all chosen from the top ranks of their profession. They were just as skilled and athletic, as well-trained, as performers are today. But today’s girl’s seem more physically attractive, their legs seem longer and more perfectly formed–bluntly, sexier, than the hoofers playing the same parts in the old movies. In fact, many of the old-time sex bombshells from Hollywood just don’t seem to have as good a figure as even the typical modern B-level starlet.

I’ve noticed the same thing in athletes (figure skaters, gymnasts, swimmers, etc), but the sample size is much smaller so it is hard to say I’m seeing a trend, or if I’m just making it all up.

Could this be function of modern diet, training methods, or a tendency to cast different body types? Or perhaps its a slowly evolving standard or expectation of feminine beauty. I’m sure a similar effect would be noticeable among male performers, but its harder to pick up on because they wear more clothes. And maybe I’m not paying as much attention.

This is not a frivolous question. I’ve been a fan of old movies for a long time, and I’ve noticed this effect for years. I also realize that physical attractiveness is completely subjective and driven by cultural norms and fashion as well as biological health or apparent reproductive fitness. We all recognize that different cultures and different eras of our own culture have had different and changing standards of “beauty”. Look at the paintings of the old masters, fat girls and pale skins used to be in, tanned and skinny are the rage today. I’ve also noticed changes in what is considered “attractive” even in my own lifetime. Is it perception or population that is changing?

I’m interested in your comments.

  • I blame the liberals... by RL 2020-06-21 11:49:22
    • It was one of the lesser-known successes of the New Deal. by hank 2020-06-21 12:37:02

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register