There’s a reason this is on Snopes
Of course Snopes makes the same lame excuse for the lack of media coverage- it simply wasn’t bloody enough. Bullshit. This shooting occurred just 2 days after SandyHook. They should have been all over it as “the second shooting in two days!”
The difference is there was no “assault weapon” involved.
And the shooter was stopped by a gun.
Teachers who want to be armed and receive the proper training should be supported in their efforts. It’s one of the only realistic proposals that would protect school children.
-
Well, I have the facts...now I am gonna spin it to my satisfaction.
*They* kept quiet about it because there ...
-
Signal to noise ratio
-
Rob was referring to a very specific category of shooting.
-
That's what I said: cherry-picking
-
Given the details of actual gun death statistics, the entire "assault rifle" flap is cherry-picking.
-
I thought the NRA proposal was "volunteers", not "cops in schools".
-
The exact quote from LaPierre's press conference:
-
And here I was trusting Rob's description. Never mind.
-
I didn't mention the NRA. n/t
-
The exact quote's been out there all this time.
-
You say I mischaracterized what LaPierre said? Care to point that out to me, please?
- (an apology will work, in lieu)
-
I don't think repetition will help much with these guys. Nice try though. n/t
-
You say I mischaracterized what LaPierre said? Care to point that out to me, please?
-
I didn't mention the NRA. n/t
-
And here I was trusting Rob's description. Never mind.
-
The exact quote from LaPierre's press conference:
-
I thought the NRA proposal was "volunteers", not "cops in schools".
-
Given the details of actual gun death statistics, the entire "assault rifle" flap is cherry-picking.
-
That's what I said: cherry-picking
-
Rob was referring to a very specific category of shooting.
- "Reporters don't report buildings that don't burn."