This is one of the reasons President Clinton had a booming economy. He raised taxes on the wealthy. Rather than pay the higher tax rate by extracting profits for personal use and having it sit on the sidelines, they re-invested it, creating a chain reaction of jobs.
What we are seeing today is lower taxes leading to owners extracting money rather than reinvesting it. The cash sits on the sidelines in bank accounts, or in their wallets. So let’s raise taxes, and “force” this idle cash back into businesses for reinvestment and create the jobs this country needs.
-
So let me get this straight: the job creation engines are the tax breaks, investment write-offs, and other business ...
- EDITED: No. You've got it dead wrong. "... tax breaks, investment write-offs, and other business tax 'expenditures'" are tax ...
-
You don't read very well. Because of tax breaks, the wealthy are just SITTING on their money. Without ...
-
And you're not reading at all.
-
But they are NOT investing. Which is the point. They are letting the money sit there. Got ...
-
Tom, if it isn't taxed, he doesn't HAVE to invest in order to save it from the taxman. He ...
-
Okay, one more time:
- I saw the former Governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm, on the Jon Stewart Show overnight and she was quite impressive. ...
-
We're not quite that dense, pal. We know exactly what is going on. Listen carefully.
The rich used to be ...
-
Are you saying that taxing someone at 90% is a "fair share? I really hope you don't think that.
- Yes. Yes. Of course. The idea was to "get them to plow that back into productive use, like foundations, ...
-
Are you saying that taxing someone at 90% is a "fair share? I really hope you don't think that.
-
Okay, one more time:
-
But they are NOT investing. Which is the point. They are letting the money sit there. Got ...
-
And you're not reading at all.
-
Bonus question:
- Outstanding! Now why didn't I think of that? Of course, the "job creators" would rather actually create jobs than ...