• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Mark your calendars for February 6 BuckGalaxy December 22, 2025 11:24 pm (Space/Science)

The answer is blowin' in the wind BuckGalaxy December 22, 2025 6:05 pm (CurrentEvents)

Damn the Defiant! ER December 22, 2025 4:31 pm (CurrentEvents)

The gecko in the mailbox ER December 18, 2025 4:54 pm (Off-Topic)

Ancient footprints RL December 16, 2025 5:28 pm (Space/Science)

What an unimaginable asshole BuckGalaxy December 15, 2025 9:26 pm (Flame)

We are soooo fucked RL December 15, 2025 6:59 pm (Space/Science)

Day 346 ER December 14, 2025 10:53 am (Space/Science)

Home » Space/Science

Kepler 62f March 12, 2014 1:06 am FrankC

I know there is an equation to calculate the gravity of exo-planets and I think it has come up here. What would the gravity be based on the following stats.

I think it would only be a little over earth G but I have no idea how to calculate it.

Actually, they are just guessing wildly at the mass. Based on the stats below, I have seen speculation that it would have a gravity of 1.4 G. Since the radius is also 1.4 I wonder if it is a coincidence or would the radius always be an indicator, assuming the mass is earthlike?

Mass (m) 2.57[3] M⊕
Radius (r) 1.41 (± 0.07)[2] R⊕

  • The third way -- an extrasolar search primer. by ER 2014-03-13 16:52:54
    • g @ m/r**2 by ER 2014-03-12 03:44:57
      • PS by ER 2014-03-12 10:33:31
        • If you Google the exo-planets... by FrankC 2014-03-12 21:37:19
          • What a planet is made of should not affect its mass, by ER 2014-03-13 06:04:38
            • So if a planet that was exactly the radius of Earth... by FrankC 2014-03-13 10:11:39
              • Gravity would be affected. by ER 2014-03-13 12:38:50
          • PPS - " would the radius always be an indicator" by ER 2014-03-12 19:08:12

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register