My answer to that question is that I am trying to tell you very many things in a very compact/compressed form, unfortunately I can not take the time and effort to go into minute details of every aspect of what I am trying to tell, so, instead, I’ll point out some things that I find very interesting in the relativistic universe.
You wrote that: “Einstein showed us mass and energy are intimately related, they are two aspects of the same thing” . I agree with that statement, but Einstein’s theory does not explain exactly how mass and energy are related, in other words: If energy and mass are two separate entities how do they combine to form the mass/energy unit? Or another way of asking the question is: What is “mass,” and what is “energy”?
One thing I am trying to tell you is that the formula that I posted here gives a better definition, or understanding, of the structure of mass and energy and how they are combined.
I also agree that time and space can not be separated, I also agree that space and time can change, but I disagree with the statement that the speed of light always is the same. I agree that there is a universal constant associated with the speed of light, but it is not the speed itself that is constant, but the acceleration that the photons obtain when leaving the source.
That is what the posted “simple” mathematical formula represents.
-
How are you mistaken? Let me count the ways.
-
I am a curious type, so I need more answers than most.
-
The difference between hypothesis and speculation...
-
*phase space
-
It is interesting that
-
Your equation is identical to Einstein's.
-
If a ton of lead falls on a person it will hurt much more than a ton of featers would.
-
No.
-
Exactly my point, but I'm taking the explanation to the sub atomic level, not only that,
-
Have you gone out west yet?
-
Was lucky I suppose ;-)
-
Government Man . . .
-
A jack-booted statist oppressor of free men.
-
Thanks guys, I'm still learning things, so, I can't be over the hill yet.
-
Thanks guys, I'm still learning things, so, I can't be over the hill yet.
-
Government Man . . .
-
Was lucky I suppose ;-)
-
Have you gone out west yet?
-
Basic physics. (n/t)
-
Exactly my point, but I'm taking the explanation to the sub atomic level, not only that,
-
No.
-
If a ton of lead falls on a person it will hurt much more than a ton of featers would.
-
Your equation is identical to Einstein's.
-
It is interesting that
-
*phase space
-
The difference between hypothesis and speculation...
-
I am a curious type, so I need more answers than most.