• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

MAGAlomaniac BuckGalaxy December 30, 2025 2:39 pm (Flame)

Mark your calendars for February 6 BuckGalaxy December 22, 2025 11:24 pm (Space/Science)

The answer is blowin' in the wind BuckGalaxy December 22, 2025 6:05 pm (CurrentEvents)

Damn the Defiant! ER December 22, 2025 4:31 pm (CurrentEvents)

The gecko in the mailbox ER December 18, 2025 4:54 pm (Off-Topic)

Ancient footprints RL December 16, 2025 5:28 pm (Space/Science)

What an unimaginable asshole BuckGalaxy December 15, 2025 9:26 pm (Flame)

We are soooo fucked RL December 15, 2025 6:59 pm (Space/Science)

Home » Off-Topic

Anyone got an explanation. September 8, 2014 12:40 pm bowser

One of the things which has puzzled me for a long time involves wording.  This may be controversial, though I don’t think it should be.

Suicide bombers, people who blow themselves up in their roles as being vehicles for bombs, are universally referred to as “cowards”.  They are disparaged as picking on non-combatants as well as combatants and vilified as evil and uncivilized.

Now pilots who bomb cities from altitude, bombing men, women, children, houses, animals, literally everything are not regarded as cowards, but as heroes, America’s finest, warriors from the greatest traditions even though they do not unduly risk their lives and never see their victims.

I would think the person who believes so much in their causes they are willing to die for them is more courageous than the person who simply sits in a flying office and takes relatively few chances.

  • What ER said.. by mcfly 2014-09-08 13:42:15
    • 50 mission crush. by ER 2014-09-08 13:30:10

      Search

      The Control Panel

      • Log in
      • Register