• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Birthright Citizenship RobVG June 29, 2025 3:34 pm (CurrentEvents)

To be blunt, NASA is now dead RL June 27, 2025 11:56 am (Space/Science)

Musk trashes his own AI after it chose a liberal worldview. RobVG June 23, 2025 9:56 am (CurrentEvents)

Psyche keeps its date with an asteroid BuckGalaxy June 22, 2025 5:21 pm (Space/Science)

Just for the record... ER June 22, 2025 8:59 am (CurrentEvents)

The Three Unknowns After the U.S. Strike on Iran BuckGalaxy June 22, 2025 12:58 am (CurrentEvents)

There are only nine meals between mankind and anarchy. BuckGalaxy June 22, 2025 12:29 am (Flame)

Not ready for prime time BuckGalaxy June 19, 2025 12:18 pm (Space/Science)

hypocrisy ER June 15, 2025 2:30 pm (Flame)

NSIDC offline? ER June 12, 2025 12:19 pm (Space/Science)

Wouldn't it be nice BuckGalaxy June 11, 2025 3:13 pm (Off-Topic)

Thank You Falettinme Be Mice Elf Agin BuckGalaxy June 9, 2025 1:35 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » CurrentEvents

2 hostages accidentally killed in US drone "mistake" April 23, 2015 1:18 pm hank

That headline is quoted directly from an MSNBC “breaking news” banner.

You know the story. US drone strikes on Al-Quaeda compounds in Pakistan (Or is it Afghanistan? Does it really matter?) kill insurgents, Al-Quaeda officials, Western hostages, and perhaps others as well.

The drone program is under criticism, the President has apologized, the hostages’ families have protested, and there has been general uproar and hand-wringing.

Does this mean that if the insurgent compounds had been hit by a bomb dropped from a manned aircraft it would have been OK? How about an unmanned cruise missile? What about an artillery shell fired from a great distance away? Or small arms fire from a rescue team of US SEALS just outside the wire? Does it really matter? As Secretary Clinton once put it, “What difference does it make?”

We are at war with people who are trying to kill us. We have every right to attack their facilities and installations, which are located in remote places where it is impossible to gather complete and detailed intelligence. If the insurgents choose to keep our prisoners in their strongholds, or use local civilians as human shields and we have no way of determining this, should we suspend all offensive operations against them?

I don’t think so. In every war, there will be innocents placed in the line of fire, either by accident, or as a deliberate tactic. Although one would expect belligerents to take reasonable precautions against targeting them, it is the nature of war that there will be civilian deaths. But regardless of that, what is the fundamental difference between a missile dropped from a remotely piloted drone and one dropped from a piloted aircraft miles away from the target? Or an artilleryman laying his piece at an anonymous set of coordinates 20 kilometers away?

There is no difference. And I’m starting to wonder if the critics of drone warfare are more motivated by denying us victories than they are at promoting civilized and humane forms of conflict.

  • Happened in January. We find out now? by bowser 2015-04-24 09:46:46
    • News travels slow in the Hindu Kush. by hank 2015-04-24 11:25:54

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register