I’d have a hard time coming up with a definite opinion, which is in a way an opinion. It’s as if the show was conceived as an idea by a marketing department, tested and refined in focus groups, resulting in a comprehensive series specification that was turned over to a competent production company for execution.
Competent, but not a whiff of genius anywhere I can see.
A lot of series seem to make the mistake of spending too much time up front on character development, at the expense of advancing the plot. I now know all about the foibles and character flaws of the main characters, but I’m still waiting for a plot to develop. There are lots of plot devices littering the show–factions, spies, little girls being cute and teen romance and allusions to crosstime conspiracy–but I’m still waiting for them to be assembled into a story. Not that I think character development should be stinted, but in the real world they c ould run out of time and Fox might pull the plug before they ever start to really tell their story. Whatever it might be.
I’m going to keep right on watching the show…right up until Fox cancels it at the end of this season, I’m betting. Not bad enough to stop watching, not good enough to renew…that’s TV sci-fi for you.
-
The science channel had a special on Gene Roddenbury and Star trek last night.
It got me thinking about this thread ...
-
You're right, the second-chance premise has a lot of potential. Possibly more than Roddenberry's wagon train to the stars.
Roddenberry was ...
- If humanity finds a new place to survive, that's part of evolution too. Nature, along with all other living ...
-
You're right, the second-chance premise has a lot of potential. Possibly more than Roddenberry's wagon train to the stars.
Roddenberry was ...
-
That pretty much nails it but it is flirting with being unwatchable.
It has become a show about teen angst. First ...
-
" Not bad enough to stop watching, not good enough to renew.."
-
That was certainly a comprehensive diss. If "diss" is short for dissection. Or vivisection.
-
And the commander's desk, that's just plain badass n/t
-
Commander's pretty excessively badass himself. Every desk should express the personality of its occupant.
-
Commander's pretty excessively badass himself. Every desk should express the personality of its occupant.
-
And the commander's desk, that's just plain badass n/t
-
That was certainly a comprehensive diss. If "diss" is short for dissection. Or vivisection.