• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Did we detect an exploding primordial black hole? RL February 7, 2026 5:29 pm (Space/Science)

Is anybody paying attention? ER February 6, 2026 4:47 pm (CurrentEvents)

Did you think there was a limit to Trump's narcissism? BuckGalaxy February 6, 2026 1:33 am (CurrentEvents)

A funny (?) interaction with chatgpt RL February 4, 2026 9:05 pm (Space/Science)

Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself BuckGalaxy February 4, 2026 3:53 pm (Flame)

FALLOUT on Amazon Prime BuckGalaxy February 3, 2026 9:33 pm (Science Fiction)

Blue Origin halts New Shepard flights BuckGalaxy January 31, 2026 3:13 am (Space/Science)

Trouble on the way BuckGalaxy January 28, 2026 1:47 pm (CurrentEvents)

Being a tech bro gets you a commission and a uniform podrock January 28, 2026 11:16 am (CurrentEvents)

Artificial Intelligence ER January 28, 2026 6:56 am (Flame)

Emily Blunt's favorite sandwich. ER January 27, 2026 7:46 am (Comestible Zone)

hey hey SDG January 26, 2026 10:38 pm (6)

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices December 3, 2011 6:53 pm RobVG

Massachusetts Sues 5 Major Banks Over Foreclosure Practices

Banks can only sell the foreclosed homes at the now depreciated market value- or less. They are taking the same loss as if they were to write down the current homeowner’s loan. And get this, they don‘t take a loss either way.

A real life example:

30 year loans at 5%

Value before collapse = $375000
Monthly payment (interest and principle) = $2000
Interest paid (bank profit) after 30 years = $350000

Now when the bank writes the home down either for a bank owned sale or for the struggling home owner (doubtful):

Current market value = $250,000
Monthly payment = $1300
Interest $233,000

Reduction in profit = $117,000

This reduction is equivalent to the original loan at an interest rate of 1.75% which is 3X the rate the banks pay us on a 12 month CD.

This baffles me because the banks are going to take the hit anyway because they can’t sell the home for more than market value and a most cases they take it the shorts (pun intended).

Why not work with the homeowner who would see a reduction of $700 in their monthly payment? Now banks are letting the home rot for months or renting it for ½ of the rental price of comparable homes in the area. Banks should partner with homeowner, especially since these assholes got us in this mess in the first place!

  • Maybe it's moral. by Robert 2011-12-03 19:02:43
    • Except the loan sharks were willing to work with the borrower when it was to their mutual interest. Maybe ... by ER 2011-12-03 19:14:45

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register