I have a problem with This.
The point of the survey was to assign greater value to one life over another. Do we kill someone in a wheelchair before killing a pedestrian? A human driver would never have time to choose. It reminds me of Eugenics.
- 
Any thoughts/comments on the topic?
- 
Lets not get bogged down in bogus ethical issues.
- 
Seems like you're playing Devil's advocate.
- 
You're right though. Profits are why we have seatbelts and airbags.
- 
NO! Government regulation is why we have seatbelts and airbags.
- 
Who do you think pushed for those regulations?
- 
The car makers didn't push for fuel economy or pollution control either.
- 
Insurance companies lobbied for seat belts and airbags.
- 
Yes, insurance companies did a good thing. because it increased their profits.
- I don't think I've disagreed with anything you have said? n/t
 
 
- 
Yes, insurance companies did a good thing. because it increased their profits.
 
- 
Insurance companies lobbied for seat belts and airbags.
- 
Not the car makers
 
- 
The car makers didn't push for fuel economy or pollution control either.
 
- 
Who do you think pushed for those regulations?
 
- 
NO! Government regulation is why we have seatbelts and airbags.
 
- 
You're right though. Profits are why we have seatbelts and airbags.
 
- 
Seems like you're playing Devil's advocate.