I have a problem with This.
The point of the survey was to assign greater value to one life over another. Do we kill someone in a wheelchair before killing a pedestrian? A human driver would never have time to choose. It reminds me of Eugenics.
-
Any thoughts/comments on the topic?
-
Lets not get bogged down in bogus ethical issues.
-
Seems like you're playing Devil's advocate.
-
You're right though. Profits are why we have seatbelts and airbags.
-
NO! Government regulation is why we have seatbelts and airbags.
-
Who do you think pushed for those regulations?
-
The car makers didn't push for fuel economy or pollution control either.
-
Insurance companies lobbied for seat belts and airbags.
-
Yes, insurance companies did a good thing. because it increased their profits.
- I don't think I've disagreed with anything you have said? n/t
-
Yes, insurance companies did a good thing. because it increased their profits.
-
Insurance companies lobbied for seat belts and airbags.
-
Not the car makers
-
The car makers didn't push for fuel economy or pollution control either.
-
Who do you think pushed for those regulations?
-
NO! Government regulation is why we have seatbelts and airbags.
-
You're right though. Profits are why we have seatbelts and airbags.
-
Seems like you're playing Devil's advocate.