• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

I'm a California Man BuckGalaxy November 27, 2025 2:35 pm (CurrentEvents)

Collapse of the service access platform at Site 31 in Baikonur? BuckGalaxy November 27, 2025 12:54 pm (Space/Science)

Why the reflections? ER November 27, 2025 8:16 am (GeekSpeak)

So you Millennials think the world has given you a raw deal? ER November 25, 2025 5:27 pm (Off-Topic)

This is not a drill. NOT a drill. General Quarters, General Quarters. All hands man your battle stations. ER November 24, 2025 4:58 pm (CurrentEvents)

Xi called Trump RobVG November 24, 2025 10:26 am (CurrentEvents)

I thought this was fake news when I first saw it online BuckGalaxy November 23, 2025 10:13 pm (Space/Science)

And the worms ate into his brain BuckGalaxy November 23, 2025 7:37 pm (CurrentEvents)

Cracks propagate podrock November 22, 2025 8:54 pm (CurrentEvents)

Debunking simulation theory with more simulation theory RobVG November 20, 2025 3:09 pm (Space/Science)

SR72 RobVG November 20, 2025 1:00 pm (Off-Topic)

Home » Space/Science

Arctic June Sea Ice Extent July 6, 2022 5:11 am ER

The downward linear trend in June sea ice extent over the 44-year satellite record is 45,700 square kilometers (17,600 square miles) per year, or 3.9 percent per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average. Based on the linear trend, since 1979, June has lost 1.97 million square kilometers (761,000 square miles) of sea ice. This is equivalent to about three times the size of Texas.

The summer ice minimum is in Mid-September. That data will be posted early in October.

Its important to keep in mind that Sea Ice Extent (SIE) is not the total boreal ice cover, but the area that is covered by at least 15% sea ice. It is a function of the total amount of ice AND how much it has been dispersed or collected by wind and current. It gives information on how much open water there is to absorb sunlight as the days get longer in Arctic Summer. It also tells us nothing about the thickness of the sea ice. SIE has been chosen as the most useful metric to study ice loss at the poles because it is directly observable by satellite sensor and because it exhibits less volatility and random variation than other parameters. The change of SIE at any particular time of year, compared to previous years, is considered the best way to monitor global warming at the poles. Other metrics, such as ice volume, are not directly observable by sensors, must be modeled, and are consequently more open to debate. They are also less conservative. The sea ice volume in the Arctic has decreased much faster over the years than has the area or the extent. (Not only is there less ice, it is, as a rule, thinner). Predictions based on volume might tend to be seen as “alarmist”.

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register