• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Highly recommended ER May 23, 2025 9:20 pm (Off-Topic)

At least they didn't waste a perfectly good bottle of champagne BuckGalaxy May 22, 2025 10:31 pm (Flame)

Re-writing history ER May 22, 2025 8:24 pm (CurrentEvents)

Taking a fresh look at terraforming Mars BuckGalaxy May 20, 2025 11:07 am (Space/Science)

the v and d correction ER May 19, 2025 9:49 am (GeekSpeak)

Clearly threatening language BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 3:43 pm (Flame)

Most common planet type in the Galaxy BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:51 pm (Space/Science)

Large Loathsome Legislation fails in committee BuckGalaxy May 16, 2025 1:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

Large Hadron Collider Eureka! BuckGalaxy May 15, 2025 11:44 am (Space/Science)

Plan(et) 9 from Outer Space BuckGalaxy May 13, 2025 10:58 am (Space/Science)

Shouldn't there be an Afrikaaner-American studies department in our universities? ER May 12, 2025 2:59 pm (CurrentEvents)

The April numbers ER May 8, 2025 5:59 am (Space/Science)

Home » Flame

A solution to NASA and military cost over-runs. February 11, 2012 12:58 am bowser

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46334188/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.TzYdKcWLssI

NASA reportedly will slash planetary science to make up for telescope cost overruns

The Mars missions would take $1.4 billion.  The Webb Telescope, originally estimated at $3.5 billion is now up to $8 billion.  $4.5 billion OVER on a $3.5 billion project.  (I know about inflation, which has been quite low, and I don’t care.)

Read about the development of the F-35 and see the same things, and winding up with a near-useless craft.  (One version of the F-35 had it carrying exactly 2 air to air missiles and nothing else.)

The only way to counter this mindset of getting started, just get started, tell ‘em anything but just get started and we’ll have ‘em mentality would be to completely cancel the Webb Telescope.

Take it off the board.  No money for a rocket, sell the scrap to Edmunds and Radio Shack.  None of the “it’s almost done” stuff.  It should have been “almost done” at $3.4 billion, not now.  If you can’t build it right, you can’t run it right, and we’re sorry – after all it’s our money, you’ll get to keep what you’ve been paid.  Hubble was sent up with a faulty mirror, and we had to eat that cost, too.  Perkins-Elmer wasn’t charged a dime.  We’re tired.  Done.

No more.  The unemployment line is downtown, and you are all eligible.  Every damned last one of you, and should have been eligible $4 billion ago.  It would have been much cheaper.

See what happens to other projects downline.

  • Well look on the bright side - at least now the missions cost less than a B-2 bomber :D by VelociraptorBlade 2012-02-11 01:13:13

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register