- Entertaining.
-
Careful with the theories.
-
"And ask yourself this: If there’s nothing damaging in his returns, Romney could now, in one stroke, annihilate Harry Reid’s reputation in Washington. So why hasn’t he released them?"
-
Sigh. Gee I wish there was something Romney could do to end this entire issue???
-
Sure there is.
-
So a presidential candidate doesn't have to be as transparent as a cabinet appointee?
-
Nope.
-
"If he was so good at ducking taxes, why did he stop?"
-
Or was audited; and settled?
-
Or was audited; and settled?
- And once more...
-
"If he was so good at ducking taxes, why did he stop?"
-
Nope.
- Move along, citizen, move along Nothing here to see...
-
So a presidential candidate doesn't have to be as transparent as a cabinet appointee?
-
And...
-
Sure there is.
-
Meanwhile...
-
You do get so ANGRY.
-
Angry?
-
Yes. Angry.
-
I like your use of the word pander...
-
Well said Frank!!!!
-
I find very little to disagree with your assessment.
-
Well said Frank!!!!
-
Definitions:
-
Reframing again?
-
Again...
-
Who's the hypocrite now?
- "NO ONE thinks taxes should be higher, or government bigger."
-
I see now...
-
I edited that post to make it clearer.
-
I edited that post to make it clearer.
-
Who's the hypocrite now?
-
Again...
-
Reframing again?
-
I like your use of the word pander...
-
Yes. Angry.
-
Angry?
-
You do get so ANGRY.
-
"And ask yourself this: If there’s nothing damaging in his returns, Romney could now, in one stroke, annihilate Harry Reid’s reputation in Washington. So why hasn’t he released them?"