• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Boulder will be in your news soon. podrock June 1, 2025 3:14 pm (CurrentEvents)

It's over folks RL June 1, 2025 12:38 pm (Space/Science)

Administration solves things the old fashion way BuckGalaxy June 1, 2025 11:01 am (Flame)

Issacman out as NASA Admin BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 9:40 pm (Space/Science)

Lie, cheat and disable mechanisms... BuckGalaxy May 31, 2025 8:04 pm (Space/Science)

Big beautiful wall RobVG May 31, 2025 11:50 am (Flame)

2025 Humans to the Moon & Mars Summit May 28 and 29 BuckGalaxy May 28, 2025 2:52 pm (Space/Science)

C'mon a little closer gonna do it to you BuckGalaxy May 27, 2025 9:46 pm (Off-Topic)

Watching SpaceX Starship flight 9, 7:30pm EST BuckGalaxy May 27, 2025 3:59 pm (Space/Science)

Same old song and dance BuckGalaxy May 26, 2025 10:02 pm (Flame)

Russia and China agree to build a nuclear power plant on the moon BuckGalaxy May 26, 2025 2:03 pm (Space/Science)

Dune books 2-7 BuckGalaxy May 26, 2025 12:46 pm (Science Fiction)

Home » Space/Science

The Wow! Signal March 26, 2012 4:51 pm ER

So far the best candidate for a a SETI signal was the Wow signal in 1977.

It met all the criteria and protocols except it was only heard once. So by the rules, it is considered “inconclusive”.

The Wiki article is authoritative and detailed, so I won’t be redundant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

Incidentally, the frequency is the wavelength (1420 MHz = 21 cm) of monatomic hydrogen. Some authorities feel that is a natural wavelength for a SETI beacon, because it is a natural emission that would be used by astronomers anywhere to map the galaxy’s spiral arms. I disagree, I suspect that there is so much noise from natural interstellar hydrogen at that wavelength that a more reasonable beacon would be at some harmonic of that freq, say 42 or 11.5 cm. But who knows?

Although the wavelength corresponds to a natural process, the narrow bandwith suggests this was an artificially generated signal. If it is indeed an ET artifact, it was probably accidental, a reflection or a random antenna pointing that illuminated the earth for a few minutes, and will never find us again.

The locational uncertainty of the signal’s point of origin is roughly the size of our full moon. I’ve studied detailed charts and photographs of that area, but there is nothing of interest there except a few faint field stars.

  • Google Sky isn't the most reliant of sources either, so I've been checking star charts myself. So far, nothing ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-26 17:21:44
    • Those two narrow bands are the Right Ascension boundaries of the error box of the signal. Their heights represent ... by ER 2012-03-26 17:49:33
      • Wiki? by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-26 21:34:15
        • I meant Wikipedia. by ER 2012-03-27 04:59:14
          • Thanks for the clarification, but I read it in an encyclopedia. What I was confused about was why it ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-27 13:41:08
            • No, MY source was the Wikipedia entry on the WOW signal, and I put a link to it in my ... by ER 2012-03-27 14:32:01
              • I still wonder if we're barking up the wrong trees. by TB 2012-03-27 14:56:14
                • If you assume ET doesn't want to give its position away, (which is a perfectly reasonable assumption!) you must also ... by ER 2012-03-27 15:31:22
                  • Personally, I think that they'll be using quantum telephones and radios, like the ones in "Crimes and Glory" Basically, two or ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-27 18:18:38

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register