• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Federal judge reopens Trump’s IRS case and demands to know if her court was defrauded. BuckGalaxy May 29, 2026 10:38 pm (Flame)

Ukraine winning the war BuckGalaxy May 29, 2026 11:14 am (CurrentEvents)

New Glenn explodes in big setback for Blue Origin BuckGalaxy May 28, 2026 7:54 pm (Space/Science)

Firefly set to visit Gruithuisen Domes BuckGalaxy May 28, 2026 4:32 pm (Space/Science)

Trump threatens another ally BuckGalaxy May 27, 2026 5:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

NASA Scientists Discover Material That Could Protect Jet Engines And Moon Equipment BuckGalaxy May 25, 2026 12:36 pm (Space/Science)

SEASON 5 - FOR ALL MANKIND BuckGalaxy May 24, 2026 11:28 pm (Science Fiction)

Trump's impulsive, ill-advised war has screwed the world BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 1:46 pm (CurrentEvents)

Blue Origin's Blue Ring Asteroid Prospectors BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 12:19 pm (Space/Science)

Europe unveils the RLV C5, a partially reusable rocket designed to rival SpaceX Starship BuckGalaxy May 19, 2026 2:06 am (Space/Science)

Dividing up the World RobVG May 15, 2026 12:56 pm (CurrentEvents)

Foundation RobVG May 15, 2026 11:56 am (Science Fiction)

Home » Space/Science

The Wow! Signal March 26, 2012 4:51 pm ER

So far the best candidate for a a SETI signal was the Wow signal in 1977.

It met all the criteria and protocols except it was only heard once. So by the rules, it is considered “inconclusive”.

The Wiki article is authoritative and detailed, so I won’t be redundant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

Incidentally, the frequency is the wavelength (1420 MHz = 21 cm) of monatomic hydrogen. Some authorities feel that is a natural wavelength for a SETI beacon, because it is a natural emission that would be used by astronomers anywhere to map the galaxy’s spiral arms. I disagree, I suspect that there is so much noise from natural interstellar hydrogen at that wavelength that a more reasonable beacon would be at some harmonic of that freq, say 42 or 11.5 cm. But who knows?

Although the wavelength corresponds to a natural process, the narrow bandwith suggests this was an artificially generated signal. If it is indeed an ET artifact, it was probably accidental, a reflection or a random antenna pointing that illuminated the earth for a few minutes, and will never find us again.

The locational uncertainty of the signal’s point of origin is roughly the size of our full moon. I’ve studied detailed charts and photographs of that area, but there is nothing of interest there except a few faint field stars.

  • Google Sky isn't the most reliant of sources either, so I've been checking star charts myself. So far, nothing ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-26 17:21:44
    • Those two narrow bands are the Right Ascension boundaries of the error box of the signal. Their heights represent ... by ER 2012-03-26 17:49:33
      • Wiki? by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-26 21:34:15
        • I meant Wikipedia. by ER 2012-03-27 04:59:14
          • Thanks for the clarification, but I read it in an encyclopedia. What I was confused about was why it ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-27 13:41:08
            • No, MY source was the Wikipedia entry on the WOW signal, and I put a link to it in my ... by ER 2012-03-27 14:32:01
              • I still wonder if we're barking up the wrong trees. by TB 2012-03-27 14:56:14
                • If you assume ET doesn't want to give its position away, (which is a perfectly reasonable assumption!) you must also ... by ER 2012-03-27 15:31:22
                  • Personally, I think that they'll be using quantum telephones and radios, like the ones in "Crimes and Glory" Basically, two or ... by VelociraptorBlade 2012-03-27 18:18:38

    Search

    The Control Panel

    • Log in
    • Register