• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

How we did it in the old Navy II. ER December 4, 2025 5:09 pm (CurrentEvents)

How we did it in the old Navy. ER December 4, 2025 4:17 pm (CurrentEvents)

Rocket man BuckGalaxy December 1, 2025 9:54 pm (CurrentEvents)

Yesterday was the 332nd day of the year 2025 ER November 30, 2025 1:41 pm (Space/Science)

All I know is what I see on the Internet. ER November 30, 2025 7:21 am (CurrentEvents)

I'm a California Man BuckGalaxy November 27, 2025 2:35 pm (CurrentEvents)

Collapse of the service access platform at Site 31 in Baikonur? BuckGalaxy November 27, 2025 12:54 pm (Space/Science)

Why the reflections? ER November 27, 2025 8:16 am (GeekSpeak)

So you Millennials think the world has given you a raw deal? ER November 25, 2025 5:27 pm (Off-Topic)

This is not a drill. NOT a drill. General Quarters, General Quarters. All hands man your battle stations. ER November 24, 2025 4:58 pm (CurrentEvents)

Xi called Trump RobVG November 24, 2025 10:26 am (CurrentEvents)

Home » GeekSpeak

Redaction Action August 10, 2018 9:31 am ER

Something interesting has arisen here in Florida concerning the Parkland shooting, although this post is not strictly about the shooting, but about a quirky consequence of our digital universe.

Apparently a long-awaited consultant’s report on the shooting was released publicly recently, but in order to comply with the shooter’s privacy considerations, large sections of it were redacted. That is, if you printed out the report, or brought up the file on your computer to read it, whole sections of it were “blacked out”, overprinted with a black stripe, impossible to read. Naturally, these are the parts journalists and the public were most interested in!

There was so little useful information in the report that one reporter did a “find” on the text to locate every mention of the shooter’s name. The find worked, even though it located those mentions even in paragraphs that had been blacked out! As it turns out, the redacted text was still in the file, it was only temporarily obscured by the text editor that the document was composed on, and later read with. The upshot was that the reporter simply copied the original, redacted document to another file with a different name and the opaque stripes disappeared, revealing the redacted text concealed beneath.

Whether this was a deliberate ploy by the publishers of the document, or a colossal error on their part, is irrelevant. Its still a good thing to know.

  • Manafort's lawyers just made the same mistake, and revealed more collusion... by RL 2019-01-08 23:16:06
    • There is no collusion. by ER 2019-01-09 08:33:23
    • Digital documents are dangerous that way by Robert 2018-08-10 11:20:45
      • Police are NOT hired for their IQ by RL 2018-08-10 10:04:28

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register