• Space/Science
  • GeekSpeak
  • Mysteries of
    the Multiverse
  • Science Fiction
  • The Comestible Zone
  • Off-Topic
  • Community
  • Flame
  • CurrentEvents

Recent posts

Starship V3 set to make its first launch 6:30pm ET on Monday, May 19 BuckGalaxy May 12, 2026 4:52 pm (Space/Science)

Good idea, for what it's worth... BuckGalaxy May 11, 2026 11:00 pm (CurrentEvents)

Consequences of the Orange Moron's idiotic war BuckGalaxy May 11, 2026 1:36 am (CurrentEvents)

How are you supposed to win a war when you avoid killing people RobVG May 8, 2026 5:47 pm (CurrentEvents)

There's no way the Post WW2 order can be revived after Trump BuckGalaxy April 30, 2026 5:26 pm (CurrentEvents)

Trump had to be stopped from using nuclear weapons on Iran (edit - no evidence for claim... BAD RL!) RL April 21, 2026 7:57 pm (CurrentEvents)

New Glenn 3 flight profile BuckGalaxy April 18, 2026 12:08 am (Space/Science)

NASA's Moon Base User’s Guide BuckGalaxy April 16, 2026 3:10 pm (Space/Science)

Meanwhile, bye bye National Forest Service podrock April 9, 2026 8:13 am (CurrentEvents)

Is Isreal really a US ally RobVG April 8, 2026 5:21 pm (CurrentEvents)

Eventually, one has to just admit it. podrock April 6, 2026 8:08 pm (CurrentEvents)

Home » GeekSpeak

Redaction Action August 10, 2018 9:31 am ER

Something interesting has arisen here in Florida concerning the Parkland shooting, although this post is not strictly about the shooting, but about a quirky consequence of our digital universe.

Apparently a long-awaited consultant’s report on the shooting was released publicly recently, but in order to comply with the shooter’s privacy considerations, large sections of it were redacted. That is, if you printed out the report, or brought up the file on your computer to read it, whole sections of it were “blacked out”, overprinted with a black stripe, impossible to read. Naturally, these are the parts journalists and the public were most interested in!

There was so little useful information in the report that one reporter did a “find” on the text to locate every mention of the shooter’s name. The find worked, even though it located those mentions even in paragraphs that had been blacked out! As it turns out, the redacted text was still in the file, it was only temporarily obscured by the text editor that the document was composed on, and later read with. The upshot was that the reporter simply copied the original, redacted document to another file with a different name and the opaque stripes disappeared, revealing the redacted text concealed beneath.

Whether this was a deliberate ploy by the publishers of the document, or a colossal error on their part, is irrelevant. Its still a good thing to know.

  • Manafort's lawyers just made the same mistake, and revealed more collusion... by RL 2019-01-08 23:16:06
    • There is no collusion. by ER 2019-01-09 08:33:23
    • Digital documents are dangerous that way by Robert 2018-08-10 11:20:45
      • Police are NOT hired for their IQ by RL 2018-08-10 10:04:28

        Search

        The Control Panel

        • Log in
        • Register